Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc

General

Total Cases8

Active Cases--

Patents1

CourtsC.D. California E.D. Texas D. Massachusetts

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
05/24/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 40 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is APPROVED. All claims in the above- captioned action are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, and each party shall bear its/her own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) (Entered: 05/24/2022)
05/24/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	Updated Civil Docket 29-10-2021
05/19/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) filed by Plaintiff Rachel Yates. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Zhen, Chris) (Entered: 05/19/2022)
05/10/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 33 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Order Granting Motion to Dismiss was entered on April 13, 2022, in the related matter, Rachel Yates v. Walmart Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-07519-MCS-GJS (Dkt. 33). Thereafter, Plaintiff in that action filed a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 34), and the parties filed a Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer (Dkt. 35). In light of these proceedings, the parties in this matter are ordered to meet and confer regarding whether the Order Granting Motion to Dismiss warrants any action in this matter similar to what occurred in the related action. If the parties here agree that Plaintiff should file a Second Amended Complaint in lieu of proceeding with the pending Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, then on or before May 20, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint together with a stipulation and proposed order as to its filing and the date by which Defendant would respond. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). If the parties do not reach such an agreement, then on or before May 20, 2022, the parties shall file a joint report setting forth their collective and/or respective positions as to whether the Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in the related matter should be considered by the Court in connection with Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hoa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (Entered: 05/10/2022) (IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 33 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Order Granting Motion to Dismiss was entered on April 13, 2022, in the related matter, Rachel Yates v. Walmart Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-07519-MCS-GJS (Dkt. 33). Thereafter, Plaintiff in that action filed a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 34), and the parties filed a Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer (Dkt. 35). In light of these proceedings, the parties in this matter are ordered to meet and confer regarding whether the Order Granting Motion to Dismiss warrants any action in this matter similar to what occurred in the related action. If the parties here agree that Plaintiff should file a Second Amended Complaint in lieu of proceeding with the pending Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, then on or before May 20, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint together with a stipulation and proposed order as to its filing and the date by which Defendant would respond. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). If the parties do not reach such an agreement, then on or before May 20, 2022, the parties shall file a joint report setting forth their collective and/or respective positions as to whether the Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in the related matter should be considered by the Court in connection with Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hoa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (Entered: 05/10/2022)
04/19/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER TAKING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 33 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the matters raised with respect to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (the "Motion" (Dkt. 33 )), the matter can be decided without oral argument. Local Rule 7.15. The Court advises counsel that the Motion, noticed for hearing on April 25, 2022, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hoa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (Entered: 04/19/2022) (IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER TAKING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 33 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the matters raised with respect to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (the "Motion" (Dkt. 33 )), the matter can be decided without oral argument. Local Rule 7.15. The Court advises counsel that the Motion, noticed for hearing on April 25, 2022, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hoa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (Entered: 04/19/2022)
04/18/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 33 filed by Defendant Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Pfingst, Taylor) (Entered: 04/18/2022)
01/31/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY In Support of Motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 33 filed by Defendant Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.. (Pfingst, Taylor) (Entered: 01/31/2022)
01/17/22	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 33 filed by Plaintiff Rachel Yates. (Zhen, Chris) (Entered: 01/17/2022)
12/23/21	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Opposition and Reply as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 33 filed by Plaintiff Rachel Yates.(Zhen, Chris) (Entered: 12/23/2021)
12/20/21	Rachel Yates v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc 2:21-CV-06204 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/25/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Pfingst, Taylor) (Entered: 12/20/2021)