Phillips 66 Co

General

Total Cases12

Active Cases--

Patents483

CourtsS.D. Texas E.D. Texas D. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L1

D

PTAB

L3

E

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/07/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Green on behalf of Magema Technology LLC, filed. (Green, Robert) (Entered: 12/07/2023)
12/07/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Green on behalf of Magema Technology LLC, filed. (Green, Robert) (Entered: 12/07/2023)
12/07/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Keville on behalf of Magema Technology LLC, filed. (Keville, John) (Entered: 12/07/2023)
12/07/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Keville on behalf of Magema Technology LLC, filed. (Keville, John) (Entered: 12/07/2023)
11/30/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Because the parties presented conflicting evidence on the disputed issues from which the jury could reasonably have concluded that Magema did not prove its claims by a preponderance of the evidence, the court will not disturb the jury's verdict by ordering a new trial. After considering the record as a whole, the court is not persuaded that manifest injustice will result from letting the verdict stand. For the reasons stated in § III, Magema's [292] MOTION for New Trial is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4) (Entered: 11/30/2023) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Because the parties presented conflicting evidence on the disputed issues from which the jury could reasonably have concluded that Magema did not prove its claims by a preponderance of the evidence, the court will not disturb the jury's verdict by ordering a new trial. After considering the record as a whole, the court is not persuaded that manifest injustice will result from letting the verdict stand. For the reasons stated in § III, Magema's [292] MOTION for New Trial is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4) (Entered: 11/30/2023)
11/30/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Because the parties presented conflicting evidence on the disputed issues from which the jury could reasonably have concluded that Magema did not prove its claims by a preponderance of the evidence, the court will not disturb the jury's verdict by ordering a new trial. After considering the record as a whole, the court is not persuaded that manifest injustice will result from letting the verdict stand. For the reasons stated in § III, Magema's [292] MOTION for New Trial is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4) (Entered: 11/30/2023) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Because the parties presented conflicting evidence on the disputed issues from which the jury could reasonably have concluded that Magema did not prove its claims by a preponderance of the evidence, the court will not disturb the jury's verdict by ordering a new trial. After considering the record as a whole, the court is not persuaded that manifest injustice will result from letting the verdict stand. For the reasons stated in § III, Magema's [292] MOTION for New Trial is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4) (Entered: 11/30/2023)
08/31/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	REPLY in Support of [292] MOTION for New Trial, filed by Magema Technology LLC. (Jones, Miranda) (Entered: 08/31/2023)
08/31/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	REPLY in Support of [292] MOTION for New Trial, filed by Magema Technology LLC. (Jones, Miranda) (Entered: 08/31/2023)
08/24/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	RESPONSE to 292 MOTION for New Trial filed by Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Company, WRB Refining LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Day 1 Transcript Excerpt, # 2 Exhibit B - Day 2 Transcript Excerpt, # 3 Exhibit C - Day 3 Transcript Excerpt, # 4 Exhibit D - Day 4 Transcript Excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Day 5 Transcript Excerpt, # 6 Exhibit F - Day 6 Transcript Excerpt, # 7 Proposed Order)(Drake, Denise) (Entered: 08/24/2023) RESPONSE to 292 MOTION for New Trial filed by Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Company, WRB Refining LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Day 1 Transcript Excerpt, # 2 Exhibit B - Day 2 Transcript Excerpt, # 3 Exhibit C - Day 3 Transcript Excerpt, # 4 Exhibit D - Day 4 Transcript Excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Day 5 Transcript Excerpt, # 6 Exhibit F - Day 6 Transcript Excerpt, # 7 Proposed Order)(Drake, Denise) (Entered: 08/24/2023)
08/24/23	Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66 4:20-CV-02444 ( S.D. TX )	RESPONSE to 292 MOTION for New Trial filed by Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Company, WRB Refining LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Day 1 Transcript Excerpt, # 2 Exhibit B - Day 2 Transcript Excerpt, # 3 Exhibit C - Day 3 Transcript Excerpt, # 4 Exhibit D - Day 4 Transcript Excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Day 5 Transcript Excerpt, # 6 Exhibit F - Day 6 Transcript Excerpt, # 7 Proposed Order)(Drake, Denise) (Entered: 08/24/2023) RESPONSE to 292 MOTION for New Trial filed by Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Company, WRB Refining LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Day 1 Transcript Excerpt, # 2 Exhibit B - Day 2 Transcript Excerpt, # 3 Exhibit C - Day 3 Transcript Excerpt, # 4 Exhibit D - Day 4 Transcript Excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Day 5 Transcript Excerpt, # 6 Exhibit F - Day 6 Transcript Excerpt, # 7 Proposed Order)(Drake, Denise) (Entered: 08/24/2023)