Pictometry Intl Corp

General

Total Cases26
Active Cases4
Patents125
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L3
E
PTAB
L5
A
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
09/10/24
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO EAGLEVIEW'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF ACCUSED CAMERA SYSTEMS - granting in part and denying in part [380] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [386] Motion to Seal; granting [389] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [407] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [411] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting [413] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO NEARMAP'S DISCOVERY MOTION REGARDING OPENSOLAR AND CORELOGIC AGREEMENTS - granting in part and denying in part [350] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [357] Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part [377] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [394] Motion to Seal. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
07/18/24
NOTICE of Status of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Proceedings by Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap US (Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
05/17/24
DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024)
05/16/24
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND INSPECTION - re 406 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/16/24. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
04/24/24
**SEALED DOCUMENT** re 441 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion filed by Defendants Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap USNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 04/24/2024)
04/24/24
Defendant's MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re 441 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion filed by Defendants Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap US. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order x) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 04/24/2024)
04/24/24
Redacted REPLY to Response to Motion re 415 Defendant's MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap US. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 04/24/2024)
04/22/24
ORDER granting 425 Motion to Amend Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 4/22/2024. (mh) (Entered: 04/22/2024)
04/22/24
EXHIBITS filed by Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap US re 434 Notice of Nonelectronic Filing. The exhibits 1, 2 and 3 to 433 are not uploaded to the docket due to file type. The drive with the exhibits will be retained in a case file folder in the Clerk's Office while the case is active, and according to the retention schedule set forth by the Judicial Conference thereafter. (mh) (Entered: 04/22/2024)