Polestar Automotive USA Inc

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsD. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/03/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED re 20 Stipulation and Order. CASE STAYED (pending IPR Proceedings). Scheduling Order Deadlines TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/3/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 03/03/2023)
03/03/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	Joint STIPULATION to Stay the Litigation Pending Final Resolution of the IPR Proceeding by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. (Jones, Keith) (Entered: 03/03/2023)
02/06/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	Pro Hac Vice Attorney Frederick A. Tecce for Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) (Entered: 02/06/2023)
02/01/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 12/6/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 12/6/2023. Fact Discovery completed by 8/29/2024. Opening Expert Reports due by 2/14/2025. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 3/18/2025. Reply Expert Reports due by 4/23/2025. Expert Discovery due by 5/30/2025. Dispositive Motions due by 6/2/2025. Claim Construction Opening Brief served by 10/17/2024. Claim Construction Answering Brief served by 10/31/2024. Claim Construction Reply Brief served by 11/14/2024. Claim Construction Surreply Brief served by 12/5/2024. Joint Claim Construction Brief filed by 12/19/2024. A Markman Hearing is set for 1/8/2025 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A Pretrial Conference is set for 10/20/2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A 3-day Jury Trial is set for 10/27/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/1/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 02/01/2023) SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 12/6/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 12/6/2023. Fact Discovery completed by 8/29/2024. Opening Expert Reports due by 2/14/2025. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 3/18/2025. Reply Expert Reports due by 4/23/2025. Expert Discovery due by 5/30/2025. Dispositive Motions due by 6/2/2025. Claim Construction Opening Brief served by 10/17/2024. Claim Construction Answering Brief served by 10/31/2024. Claim Construction Reply Brief served by 11/14/2024. Claim Construction Surreply Brief served by 12/5/2024. Joint Claim Construction Brief filed by 12/19/2024. A Markman Hearing is set for 1/8/2025 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A Pretrial Conference is set for 10/20/2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A 3-day Jury Trial is set for 10/27/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/1/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 02/01/2023)
01/27/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Keith A. Jones regarding Revised [Proposed] Scheduling Order. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Revised Scheduling Order)(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 01/27/2023)
01/23/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER re [16-1] Proposed Scheduling Order - Having reviewed the parties' proposed Scheduling Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposal is REJECTED. To name a few reasons, several dates in the body of the proposal and in the attached chart do not match; the parties propose to file their joint claim chart on 7/10/2024, but Plaintiff is to serve its opening claim construction brief sections on 5/24/2024; the chart contains a date of 8/4/2025 to file motions in limine (according to this Court's procedures, motions in limine are not filed as stand alone filings, but rather included with the Pretrial Order) and Daubert motions (which are to be filed the same day as dispositive motions), etc. Counsel shall go back and CAREFULLY review and redo their proposal consistent with this Court's procedures. The parties shall file their updated proposal no later than 1/30/2023. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/23/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 01/23/2023) ORAL ORDER re [16-1] Proposed Scheduling Order - Having reviewed the parties' proposed Scheduling Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposal is REJECTED. To name a few reasons, several dates in the body of the proposal and in the attached chart do not match; the parties propose to file their joint claim chart on 7/10/2024, but Plaintiff is to serve its opening claim construction brief sections on 5/24/2024; the chart contains a date of 8/4/2025 to file motions in limine (according to this Court's procedures, motions in limine are not filed as stand alone filings, but rather included with the Pretrial Order) and Daubert motions (which are to be filed the same day as dispositive motions), etc. Counsel shall go back and CAREFULLY review and redo their proposal consistent with this Court's procedures. The parties shall file their updated proposal no later than 1/30/2023. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/23/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 01/23/2023)
01/13/23	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Keith A. Jones regarding the [Proposed] Scheduling Order. (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Scheduling Order)(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
12/15/22	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kyrie Kimber Cameron - filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certification in support of pro hac vice admission, # 2 Proposed order)(Donelson, Matthew) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
12/15/22	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED re 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kyrie Kimber Cameron filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/15/2022. (dlw) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
12/14/22	Charge Fusion Tech LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA Inc 1:22-CV-01379 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER -IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/14/2022. (dlw) Modified on 12/14/2022 (dlw). (Entered: 12/14/2022) ORAL ORDER -IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/14/2022. (dlw) Modified on 12/14/2022 (dlw). (Entered: 12/14/2022)