PPC Broadband Inc

General

Total Cases75

Active Cases5

Patents967

CourtsN.D. New York D. Delaware E.D. Arkansas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

PTAB

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L4

D

PTAB

L5

B

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/13/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	FINAL POST-CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 6/2/2026 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #1D before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Motions to Amend and Join Other Parties due by 1/8/2025; Discovery due by 9/5/2025; Motions due by 1/30/2026; and Pretrial Disclosure Sheet due by 5/1/2026. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 12/13/2024. (hml) (Entered: 12/13/2024)
12/10/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	ORDER granting [34] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; allowing PVM 30 days from the date of today's Order to file a Motion for Leave to Amend its Counterclaims if it chooses to do so; and giving PPC 21 days to respond to the Motion. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 12/10/2024. (ldb) (Entered: 12/10/2024)
11/22/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. With respect to [50] [51] PVM's supplemental request for claim construction, the Court adopts the Background and Discussion sections from its previous [49] Claim Construction Order (specifically, pp. 1-12). For the reasons set out in sections A and B of the Argument in [53] PPC's Responsive Supplemental Claim Construction Brief, the Court concludes that (1) PVM's request to define "a body member" as "a one-part body" is untenable, and (2) PVM's request to define "a body member" in contradistinction to the "shell" is also untenable. Furthermore, the Court believes that lay jurors will understand the term "a body member," and so that term needs no further construction. A "member" is just a (single-part or multi-part) component. And even PVM--based on its proposed construction--must believe lay jurors will understand the word "body." Finally, to avoid later confusion, the Court notes that "a body member" can be comprised of more than one piece. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/22/2024. (trd) (Entered: 11/22/2024) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. With respect to [50] [51] PVM's supplemental request for claim construction, the Court adopts the Background and Discussion sections from its previous [49] Claim Construction Order (specifically, pp. 1-12). For the reasons set out in sections A and B of the Argument in [53] PPC's Responsive Supplemental Claim Construction Brief, the Court concludes that (1) PVM's request to define "a body member" as "a one-part body" is untenable, and (2) PVM's request to define "a body member" in contradistinction to the "shell" is also untenable. Furthermore, the Court believes that lay jurors will understand the term "a body member," and so that term needs no further construction. A "member" is just a (single-part or multi-part) component. And even PVM--based on its proposed construction--must believe lay jurors will understand the word "body." Finally, to avoid later confusion, the Court notes that "a body member" can be comprised of more than one piece. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/22/2024. (trd) (Entered: 11/22/2024)
11/01/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting [54] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Genevieve M. Halpenny terminated. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/1/2024. (hml) (Entered: 11/01/2024)
11/01/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Genevieve Halpenny by PPC Broadband Inc (Baker, John) (Entered: 11/01/2024)
09/13/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	RESPONSE re 52 Order on Motion for Leave to File, PPC's Responsive Supplemental Claim Construction Brief by PPC Broadband Inc (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit, # [2] Exhibit, # [3] Exhibit, # [4] Exhibit, # [5] Exhibit, # [6] Exhibit)(Baker, John) Additional attachments added on 9/13/2024: # [7] Exhibit and # [8] Exhibit. (kbc) (Entered: 09/13/2024)
09/13/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re [53] Response. CORRECTION: Exhibits G and H were not submitted during docketing. They have been added to [53] based on the attached correspondence. (kbc) (Entered: 09/13/2024)
08/19/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting [50] Defendant's Motion for Leave to Submit Supplemental Claim Construction Briefing. The Plaintiff may file a supplemental brief (no more than 10 pages) in response by 9/13/2024. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 8/19/2024. (hml) (Entered: 08/19/2024)
08/16/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	BRIEF IN SUPPORT re [32] Trial Brief, Supplemental Claim Construction Brief filed by PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc. (Dunn, Nickolas) (Entered: 08/16/2024)
08/16/24	PPC Broadband Inc v. Perfectvision Mfg Inc 4:22-CV-00163 ( D. AR )	MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Claim Construction Briefing by PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc (Dunn, Nickolas) (Entered: 08/16/2024)