Precision Point Devices LLC

General

Total Cases3

Active Cases--

Patents4

CourtsE.D. Texas N.D. California N.D. Texas

TypeNPE

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/05/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Huawei Tech USA Inc 3:23-CV-00306 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER STAYING CASE 14 Motion to Stay. All deadlines in this matter are STAYED until 9/1/2023, at which time the parties shall advise the Court about the completion of the settlement agreement. Plaintiff may therefore proceed without local counsel until 9/1/2023, at which time Plaintiff will retain local counsel if the parties have not reached a settlement agreement. Defendant has until 9/8/2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Senior District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 7/5/2023) (ykp) (Entered: 07/05/2023) ORDER STAYING CASE 14 Motion to Stay. All deadlines in this matter are STAYED until 9/1/2023, at which time the parties shall advise the Court about the completion of the settlement agreement. Plaintiff may therefore proceed without local counsel until 9/1/2023, at which time Plaintiff will retain local counsel if the parties have not reached a settlement agreement. Defendant has until 9/8/2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Senior District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 7/5/2023) (ykp) (Entered: 07/05/2023)
06/19/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Huawei Tech USA Inc 3:23-CV-00306 ( N.D. TX )	Unopposed MOTION to Stay filed by Precision Point Devices LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 06/19/2023)
05/31/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 32 Stipulation to Dismiss.(ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2023) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
05/31/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Dismiss Without Prejudice filed by Precision Point Devices LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/31/2023) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
05/12/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	Case Reassigned to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. Judge William H. Orrick no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2023) (Entered: 05/12/2023)
05/11/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	NOTICE by ASUS Computer International re 20 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint under 35 USC Section 101 RENOTICE OF HEARING TO JUNE 8, 2023 AT 2:00 PM (Joshi, Vinay) (Filed on 5/11/2023) (Entered: 05/11/2023)
05/10/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin in the San Francisco division for all further proceedings.1. All future filings shall bear the initials AMO immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court.3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Martinez-Olguin by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. 4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff remain unchanged. 5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set after August 18, 2023, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered. 6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before August 18, 2023, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases. 7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice. 8. On or before May 31, 2023, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address all issues outlined in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District. The approved form for such statements can be accessed here. A Joint Case Management Statement is not required in prisoner cases in which the prisoner plaintiff/petitioner is not represented by counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/10/2023 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (ecg-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2023) (Entered: 05/10/2023) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin in the San Francisco division for all further proceedings.1. All future filings shall bear the initials AMO immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court.3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Martinez-Olguin by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. 4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff remain unchanged. 5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set after August 18, 2023, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered. 6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before August 18, 2023, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases. 7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice. 8. On or before May 31, 2023, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address all issues outlined in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District. The approved form for such statements can be accessed here. A Joint Case Management Statement is not required in prisoner cases in which the prisoner plaintiff/petitioner is not represented by counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/10/2023 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (ecg-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2023) (Entered: 05/10/2023)
05/02/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	NOTICE by Precision Point Devices LLC of compliance with P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-2 Disclosure Requirements (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/2/2023) (Entered: 05/02/2023)
05/02/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asus Computer Intl 3:22-CV-08298 ( N.D. CA )	CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Precision Point Devices LLC.. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/2/2023) (Entered: 05/02/2023)
05/02/23	Precision Point Devices LLC v. Huawei Tech USA Inc 3:23-CV-00306 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER granting 12 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff may therefore proceed without local counsel until 6/15/2023 at which time Plaintiff will retain local counsel if the parties have not reached a settlement agreement. Defendant has until 6/19/2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's 8 First Amended Complaint. All other deadlines in this matter are STAYED until 6/19/2023, at which time the parties shall advise the Court about the completion of the settlement agreement. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 5/2/2023) (ykp) (Entered: 05/02/2023) ORDER granting 12 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff may therefore proceed without local counsel until 6/15/2023 at which time Plaintiff will retain local counsel if the parties have not reached a settlement agreement. Defendant has until 6/19/2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's 8 First Amended Complaint. All other deadlines in this matter are STAYED until 6/19/2023, at which time the parties shall advise the Court about the completion of the settlement agreement. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 5/2/2023) (ykp) (Entered: 05/02/2023)