Procedes Chenel Intl

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsS.D. New York

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/06/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed December 5, 2024 is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd.'s claims against Defendants Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, and Procedes Chenel Int'l and Defendants Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, and Procedes Chenel Int'l's claims against Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with all attorney's fees, costs of court, and expenses borne by the party incurring same. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 12/6/2024) Chanel, Inc., Chanel, Inc., Molo Design, Ltd., Molo Design, Ltd., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Chanel SAS and Chanel, Inc. terminated. (ks) (Entered: 12/06/2024) ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed December 5, 2024 is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd.'s claims against Defendants Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, and Procedes Chenel Int'l and Defendants Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, and Procedes Chenel Int'l's claims against Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with all attorney's fees, costs of court, and expenses borne by the party incurring same. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 12/6/2024) Chanel, Inc., Chanel, Inc., Molo Design, Ltd., Molo Design, Ltd., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Chanel SAS and Chanel, Inc. terminated. (ks) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/06/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. [142] Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. (km) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/05/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Molo Design, Ltd., Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, Procedes Chenel Int'l. Related Document Number: [141] ..(Bjorklund, Shannon) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. (Entered: 12/05/2024)
12/05/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Chanel SAS and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Molo Design, Ltd., Chanel SAS. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Bjorklund, Shannon) (Entered: 12/05/2024) STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Chanel SAS and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Molo Design, Ltd., Chanel SAS. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Bjorklund, Shannon) (Entered: 12/05/2024)
12/04/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	*NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Shannon Lynne Bjorklund. RE-FILE Document No. [140] Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the wrong filer/filers was/were selected for the voluntary dismissal; (2) the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by all parties who have appeared; (3) the Proposed Order needs to be filed separately. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 12/04/2024) *NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Shannon Lynne Bjorklund. RE-FILE Document No. [140] Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the wrong filer/filers was/were selected for the voluntary dismissal; (2) the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by all parties who have appeared; (3) the Proposed Order needs to be filed separately. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
12/03/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILER ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Chanel SAS and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Molo Design, Ltd., Chanel SAS. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Bjorklund, Shannon) Modified on 12/4/2024 (tp). (Entered: 12/03/2024) FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILER ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Chanel SAS and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Chanel, Inc., Procedes Chenel Int'l, Molo Design, Ltd., Chanel SAS. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Bjorklund, Shannon) Modified on 12/4/2024 (tp). (Entered: 12/03/2024)
11/12/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting [138] Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint no later than December 13, 2024; and the parties shall submit a proposed amended schedule no later than December 14, 2024. Further extensions will not be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 11/12/2024) Chanel SAS answer due 12/13/2024; Chanel, Inc. answer due 12/13/2024 (ks) (Entered: 11/12/2024) ORDER granting [138] Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint no later than December 13, 2024; and the parties shall submit a proposed amended schedule no later than December 14, 2024. Further extensions will not be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 11/12/2024) Chanel SAS answer due 12/13/2024; Chanel, Inc. answer due 12/13/2024 (ks) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
11/11/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: [118] Amended Complaint, addressed to Judge Dale E. Ho from Shannon L. Bjorklund dated 11/11/2024. Document filed by Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS..(Bjorklund, Shannon) (Entered: 11/11/2024)
10/07/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting [136] Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application GRANTED. The parties are directed as follows: (1) All defendants (Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, and Procedes Chenel Int'l) shall respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint no later than November 13, 2024. (2) Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd. is in violation of the Court's Sept. 23, 2024 Order. See ECF No. 135. Plaintiff is directed to file proof of service of the Amended Complaint on the docket by October 11, 2024, or submit a one page letter explaining its failure to do so by the same date. (3) Per the Court's September 23, 2024 Order, all parties shall file a joint proposed amended schedule no later than November 14, 2024. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 10/7/2024) Chanel SAS answer due 11/13/2024; Chanel, Inc. answer due 11/13/2024; Procedes Chenel Int'l answer due 11/13/2024 (ks) (Entered: 10/07/2024) ORDER granting [136] Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application GRANTED. The parties are directed as follows: (1) All defendants (Chanel, Inc., Chanel SAS, and Procedes Chenel Int'l) shall respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint no later than November 13, 2024. (2) Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd. is in violation of the Court's Sept. 23, 2024 Order. See ECF No. 135. Plaintiff is directed to file proof of service of the Amended Complaint on the docket by October 11, 2024, or submit a one page letter explaining its failure to do so by the same date. (3) Per the Court's September 23, 2024 Order, all parties shall file a joint proposed amended schedule no later than November 14, 2024. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 10/7/2024) Chanel SAS answer due 11/13/2024; Chanel, Inc. answer due 11/13/2024; Procedes Chenel Int'l answer due 11/13/2024 (ks) (Entered: 10/07/2024)
10/04/24	Molo Design Ltd v. Chanel Inc 1:21-CV-01578 ( S.D. NY )	LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: [118] Amended Complaint, addressed to Judge Dale E. Ho from Shannon L. Bjorklund dated October 4, 2024. Document filed by Chanel SAS, Chanel, Inc...(Ewing, Bruce) (Entered: 10/04/2024)