Prolacta Bioscience Inc

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California D. Oregon

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

prolacta-bioscience

prolacta-bioscience

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
06/01/22	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Opinion and Order - The Court DENIES Ni-Q's Motion for Attorney's Fees, ECF 260 . The Court approves Ni-Q's cost bill, ECF 258 . Signed on 6/1/2022 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) (Entered: 06/01/2022)
01/26/22	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Reply to Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees 260, Motion to Strike Motion for Attorney Fees 260 263 . Filed by Ni-Q, LLC. (Legaard, Brenna) (Entered: 01/26/2022)
12/29/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Objections to Bill of Costs 258 . Filed by Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.. (Armon, Orion) (Entered: 12/29/2021)
12/29/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Response in Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees 260 . Filed by Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.. (Armon, Orion) (Entered: 12/29/2021)
12/28/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	ORDER - Defendant Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to File Over-Length Brief (ECF 267 ) is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) (Entered: 12/28/2021)
12/28/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Unopposed Motion to File Excess Pages . Filed by Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.. (Armon, Orion) (Entered: 12/28/2021)
12/21/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	ORDER - The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to File Over-Length Brief (ECF 264 ) and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 263 ). Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 260 ), at this time Defendant need only respond to Plaintiff's argument that this case is exceptional and that attorney fees are warranted under 35 U.S.C. Â§ 285 on the basis that Defendant committed inequitable conduct in connection with the identified patents. If the Court resolves that issue in the affirmative, the Court will then allow the parties to provide further briefing and evidence regarding the appropriate amount of attorney fees, if any. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) (Entered: 12/21/2021) ORDER - The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to File Over-Length Brief (ECF 264 ) and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 263 ). Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 260 ), at this time Defendant need only respond to Plaintiff's argument that this case is exceptional and that attorney fees are warranted under 35 U.S.C. Â§ 285 on the basis that Defendant committed inequitable conduct in connection with the identified patents. If the Court resolves that issue in the affirmative, the Court will then allow the parties to provide further briefing and evidence regarding the appropriate amount of attorney fees, if any. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) (Entered: 12/21/2021)
12/20/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Response to Motion to Strike Motion for Attorney Fees 260 263 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/20/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Motion to File Excess Pages re Motion for Attorney Fees 260 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/13/21	Ni Q LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience Inc 3:17-CV-00934 ( D. OR )	Motion to Strike Motion for Attorney Fees 260 . Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.. (Armon, Orion) (Entered: 12/13/2021)