Ranpak Corp

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents98

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

ranpak-holdings

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L2

D

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/31/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED patent report with certified copy of closing order dated 3/30/2022 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (exr, ) (Entered: 03/31/2022)
03/30/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Stipulated Dismissal 50 filed by the parties on 3/30/2022, this case is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) (Entered: 03/30/2022)
03/30/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the stipulation to dismiss, (R. 50), this court's order of Match 19, 2022, is stricken. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is returned to the assigned District Judge. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 03/30/2022)
03/30/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	STIPULATION of Dismissal of All Claims with Prejudice (Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 03/30/2022)
03/30/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	Final Civil Docket 03-30-2022
03/19/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the joint status report, (R. 48), discovery stay is lifted. Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) serve written discovery requests by April 1, 2022 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (2) serve answers to written discovery requests by April 22, 2022; (3) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by May 6, 2022; and (4) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant written discovery responses as exhibits, by May 13, 2022. The court will not consider general objections to written discovery requests if the court must address and rule on written discovery disputes. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (Kim, Young) (Entered: 03/19/2022) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the joint status report, (R. 48), discovery stay is lifted. Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) serve written discovery requests by April 1, 2022 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (2) serve answers to written discovery requests by April 22, 2022; (3) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by May 6, 2022; and (4) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant written discovery responses as exhibits, by May 13, 2022. The court will not consider general objections to written discovery requests if the court must address and rule on written discovery disputes. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (Kim, Young) (Entered: 03/19/2022)
03/18/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report by Ranpak Corp. (Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 03/18/2022)
01/28/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are ordered to file another joint status report by March 18, 2022, updating the court on the possible appeal and the next steps the parties need to take in terms of discovery in this case. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 01/28/2022)
01/28/22	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report by Ranpak Corp. (Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 01/28/2022)
10/21/21	Ranpak Corp v. Sealed Air Corp 1:19-CV-08206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are ordered to file another joint status report by January 28, 2022, updating the court on the review proceeding pending before the USPTO and the next steps the parties need to take in terms of discovery in this case. Mailed notice (Kim, Young) (Entered: 10/21/2021)