Rex Computing Inc
General
Total Cases2
Active Cases1
Patents3
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
L2
D
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
07/09/24 | ORDER DENYING 218 MOTION for Summary Judgment, DENYING 206 MOTION for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will hold a hearing to address the two claim construction disputes raised by the parties (D.I. 275) at its convenience. At that hearing, the Court will also hear from experts to the extent they have opined on the disputed terms (including offering opinions on indefiniteness of those terms). The September 30, 2024 trial date is VACATED until after the Court has addressed the claim construction disputes. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/9/2024. (dlw) (Main Document 277 replaced on 7/9/2024) (dlw). (Entered: 07/09/2024) | |
06/24/24 | Joint Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Kelly E. Farnan regarding claim construction disputes. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 06/24/2024) | |
06/24/24 | Letter to Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Kelly E. Farnan regarding Ranking of Summary Judgment Grounds. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 06/24/2024) | |
06/17/24 | ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before June 24, 2024, Defendant shall file a one-page letter with the Court ranking the grounds for summary judgment raised in its opening summary judgment brief (D.I. 120) in whatever order it chooses but with the understanding that once the Court denies summary judgment as to any single ground raised in the motion, the Court will not address any summary judgment grounds that were ranked after that ground; and to the extent that the parties contend (or that one party contends) that disputes over claim scope still remain and must be resolved before an issue goes to the jury, the parties shall meet and confer and attempt in good faith to reach a resolution or at least a distillation of what the dispute over claim scope is and shall file a joint letter that sets forth what term(s) are still disputed, what issue(s) are implicated by the dispute over claim scope and each party's proposed construction for the disputed term(s). Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/17/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 06/17/2024) | |
06/07/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 252 Reply Brief by Cerebras Systems Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
06/07/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 251 Reply Brief by Cerebras Systems Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
06/07/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 250 Declaration by Cerebras Systems Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-14)(Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
06/07/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 248 Reply Brief by Cerebras Systems Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
06/07/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 249 Declaration by Rex Computing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1-4)(Raucci, Anthony) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
06/07/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 247 Reply Brief by Rex Computing, Inc.. (Raucci, Anthony) (Entered: 06/07/2024) |