Rimco Inc

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsE.D. Tennessee W.D. Wisconsin

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/11/23	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	STIPULATION of Dismissal case with prejudice by Rimco, Inc.. (Mazza, Michael) (Entered: 02/11/2023)
02/08/23	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 45 Motion to Compel Production of Documents. The parties SHALL engage in their meet and confer no later than February 14, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on 2/8/23. (ABF) (Entered: 02/08/2023)
02/08/23	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	Now before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to File Document Under Seal [Doc. 48], seeking to seal Exhibit 5 [Doc. 49] filed in response to Defendant's motion to compel. The Court has reviewed Exhibit 5 [Doc. 49] and will place it under seal given that it reflects pricing information and the parties cited the relevant portions of Exhibit 5 [Doc. 49] in their unsealed filings. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 26.2. The Court GRANTS the Motion to File Document Under Seal [Doc. 48], and [Doc. 49] SHALL REMAIN SEALED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on 2/8/2023. (This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court.) (AGA) (Entered: 02/08/2023) Now before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to File Document Under Seal [Doc. 48], seeking to seal Exhibit 5 [Doc. 49] filed in response to Defendant's motion to compel. The Court has reviewed Exhibit 5 [Doc. 49] and will place it under seal given that it reflects pricing information and the parties cited the relevant portions of Exhibit 5 [Doc. 49] in their unsealed filings. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 26.2. The Court GRANTS the Motion to File Document Under Seal [Doc. 48], and [Doc. 49] SHALL REMAIN SEALED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on 2/8/2023. (This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court.) (AGA) (Entered: 02/08/2023)
02/06/23	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	ORDER: the Court GRANTS Defendant's request to compel Plaintiffs Rule 30(b)(6) witness deposition and HOLDS IN ABEYANCE Defendant's request for attorney's fees [Doc. 56]. On February 1, 2023, the District Judge denied Plaintiff's motion to dismiss and motion to stay discovery [Doc. 75]. In light of his ruling, the Court ORDERS the parties to complete the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition within fourteen (14) days of this Order. The Court further ORDERS Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's request for attorney's fees on or before February 20, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on February 6, 2023. (AYB) (Entered: 02/06/2023) ORDER: the Court GRANTS Defendant's request to compel Plaintiffs Rule 30(b)(6) witness deposition and HOLDS IN ABEYANCE Defendant's request for attorney's fees [Doc. 56]. On February 1, 2023, the District Judge denied Plaintiff's motion to dismiss and motion to stay discovery [Doc. 75]. In light of his ruling, the Court ORDERS the parties to complete the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition within fourteen (14) days of this Order. The Court further ORDERS Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's request for attorney's fees on or before February 20, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on February 6, 2023. (AYB) (Entered: 02/06/2023)
02/01/23	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	ORDER re 75 Memorandum: For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to dismiss and to stay discovery (Doc. 51 ) and Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 63 ).Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 2/1/2023. (BJL) (Entered: 02/01/2023)
02/01/23	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	MEMORANDUM: For the foregoing reasons, the Court will DENY Plaintiff's motion to dismiss all claims inthis case without prejudice (Doc. 51 ). The Court will DENY Plaintiff's first motion for reconsideration (Doc. 63 ). AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 2/1/2023. (BJL) (Entered: 02/01/2023)
12/16/22	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	ORDER denying 70 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. Instead of deleting Exhibit 1, see ECF Rules and Procedures 12.2, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to UNSEAL [Doc. 71 ]. In order to maintain an organized docket, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to replace the public placeholder for Exhibit 1 to Plaintiffs reply in support of its motion for reconsideration [Doc. 69-1] with the unsealed copy of the deposition transcript [Doc. 71 ]. The Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on 12/16/22. (JBR) (Entered: 12/16/2022) ORDER denying 70 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. Instead of deleting Exhibit 1, see ECF Rules and Procedures 12.2, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to UNSEAL [Doc. 71 ]. In order to maintain an organized docket, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to replace the public placeholder for Exhibit 1 to Plaintiffs reply in support of its motion for reconsideration [Doc. 69-1] with the unsealed copy of the deposition transcript [Doc. 71 ]. The Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on 12/16/22. (JBR) (Entered: 12/16/2022)
12/14/22	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	RESPONSE to Motion re 70 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal filed by Dual-Tech, Inc.. (Gilchrist, Brian) (Entered: 12/14/2022)
12/13/22	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	Now before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Doc. 70], which seeks leave to file Exhibit 1 to its Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration under seal [Doc. 71]. For grounds, Plaintiff states that Defendant designated Exhibit 1 as "Attorney Eyes Only." Defendant has not responded to the motion, and the time for doing so has expired. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1(a). The Court ORDERS Defendant to file a response to the motion on or before December 16, 2022. Should Defendant not respond by this deadline, the Court will unseal Exhibit 1 [Doc. 71]. The Court will summarily deny any future motions to seal if the parties do not comply with the Court's Memorandum and Order Regarding Sealing Confidential Information [Doc. 7]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on 12/13/2022. (This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court.) (AGA) (Entered: 12/13/2022) Now before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Doc. 70], which seeks leave to file Exhibit 1 to its Reply in Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration under seal [Doc. 71]. For grounds, Plaintiff states that Defendant designated Exhibit 1 as "Attorney Eyes Only." Defendant has not responded to the motion, and the time for doing so has expired. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1(a). The Court ORDERS Defendant to file a response to the motion on or before December 16, 2022. Should Defendant not respond by this deadline, the Court will unseal Exhibit 1 [Doc. 71]. The Court will summarily deny any future motions to seal if the parties do not comply with the Court's Memorandum and Order Regarding Sealing Confidential Information [Doc. 7]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on 12/13/2022. (This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court.) (AGA) (Entered: 12/13/2022)
11/28/22	Rimco v. Dual Tech Inc 3:21-CV-00313 ( E.D. TN )	[UNSEALED PER 74 ORDER] SEALED Proposed Sealed Document re: 70 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by Rimco, Inc. (see Ex. 1 at Doc. 69). (Mazza, Michael) Modified text and restriction on 12/16/2022 (JBR). (Entered: 11/28/2022)