RJ Technology LLC

General

Total Cases5

Active Cases5

Patents1

CourtsC.D. California E.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L2

D

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/20/24	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US7749641 in IPR2024-00597
02/23/24	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US7749641 in IPR2023-01350
02/22/24	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	The following PTAB cases were filed: Patent US7749641 in IPR2024-00597
01/22/24	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US7749641 in IPR2023-01183
01/22/24	RJ Technology LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2:22-CV-00401 ( E.D. TX )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US7749641 in IPR2023-01183
10/04/23	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, Order re Defendant's Motion to Compel (Dkt. 102). In light of the Stay Order and the pending IPR Petition before the PTAB, the hearing on the Motion (Dkt. 102) is VACATED and, due to the passage of time and potential alteration of the issues in the case, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing without reaching the merits, subject to the following.(see document for details) re 102 (mba) (Entered: 10/04/2023) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, Order re Defendant's Motion to Compel (Dkt. 102). In light of the Stay Order and the pending IPR Petition before the PTAB, the hearing on the Motion (Dkt. 102) is VACATED and, due to the passage of time and potential alteration of the issues in the case, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing without reaching the merits, subject to the following.(see document for details) re 102 (mba) (Entered: 10/04/2023)
10/04/23	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Motion to Stay 87 by Judge James V. Selna: For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to stay. Granting 87 MOTION to Stay Case. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (es) (Entered: 10/04/2023)
09/28/23	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF Hearing and Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel. For the reasons stated on the record, which are incorporated by reference herein, the Motion (Dkt. 96) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as follows. The Court separately extends the time for the parties to file supplemental memoranda in response to Defendants Motion to Compel (Dkt. 102), currently set for hearing on October 12, 2023, to 5:00 p.m. on October 5, 2023.(see document for details) re 88, 96 Court Recorder: CS 09/28/23. (mba) (Entered: 09/28/2023) MINUTES OF Hearing and Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel. For the reasons stated on the record, which are incorporated by reference herein, the Motion (Dkt. 96) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as follows. The Court separately extends the time for the parties to file supplemental memoranda in response to Defendants Motion to Compel (Dkt. 102), currently set for hearing on October 12, 2023, to 5:00 p.m. on October 5, 2023.(see document for details) re 88, 96 Court Recorder: CS 09/28/23. (mba) (Entered: 09/28/2023)
09/28/23	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	[IN CHAMBERS] SCHEDULING NOTICE: In light of the tentative ruling having been posted on Defendant's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review 87, the hearing set for 10/02/2023 at 1:30 p.m. is ordered VACATED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/28/2023)
09/22/23	RJ Technology LLC v. Apple Inc 8:22-CV-01874 ( C.D. CA )	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sharon T. Turret counsel for Plaintiff RJ Technology LLC. Sharon Turret is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by RJ Technology RJ Technology. (Turret, Sharon) (Entered: 09/22/2023)