Robert Martin

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

Courts--

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

robertmartincompany.com

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/07/25	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/7/2025. (mlp) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/07/25	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	ORDER: The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants PreSonus Corporation, Sennheiser Electronics, Sure Headquarters, Fred Pool/Peavey Electronics Corporation, and Line 6 Pod (Docs. [16] , [20] , [22] , [32] , [43] ) are GRANTED. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff Robert Martin's patent claim, and Martin has failed to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) for copyright infringement. Martin's Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. [41] ) and Motions for Default Judgment (Docs. [45] , [46] , [47] ) are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/7/2025. (mlp) (Entered: 02/07/2025) ORDER: The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants PreSonus Corporation, Sennheiser Electronics, Sure Headquarters, Fred Pool/Peavey Electronics Corporation, and Line 6 Pod (Docs. [16] , [20] , [22] , [32] , [43] ) are GRANTED. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff Robert Martin's patent claim, and Martin has failed to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) for copyright infringement. Martin's Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. [41] ) and Motions for Default Judgment (Docs. [45] , [46] , [47] ) are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/7/2025. (mlp) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
12/03/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	ORDER GRANTING [50] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Ashley N. Jaros is TERMINATED as counsel for Defendant PreSonus Audio Electronic, Inc., incorrectly named as Pre-Sonus Corporation. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/3/2024. (mlp) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 12/03/2024)
12/02/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Pre-Sonus Corporation. (Jaros, Ashley) (Entered: 12/02/2024)
11/26/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	NOTICE of Appearance by Eliot Sam Markman on behalf of Pre-Sonus Corporation (Markman, Eliot) (Entered: 11/26/2024)
09/17/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	SUPPLEMENT by Robert Martin. Supplement to [3] Complaint,. (jdc) (Entered: 09/17/2024)
09/17/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	MOTION for Default Judgment as to USA Wireless AT&T by Robert Martin. (jdc) (Entered: 09/17/2024)
09/17/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	MOTION for Default Judgment as to Nady Systems Inc. by Robert Martin. (jdc) (Entered: 09/17/2024)
09/17/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	MOTION for Default Judgment as to Boss Wireless LLC by Robert Martin. (jdc) (Entered: 09/17/2024)
08/19/24	Martin v. USA Wireless AT&T 3:24-CV-01434 ( S.D. IL )	NOTICE OF ACTION re [43] Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Fred Pool, PEAVEY ELECTRONICS CORPORATION. In all cases filed in, removed, or transferred into this Court, the attorney filing the initiating document need not file a separate entry of appearance. Once the initiating document is filed, any attorney other than the one who filed the initiating document must file a separate entry of appearance before filing a document or appearing before the Court. Attorney Bienstock does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (clw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 08/19/2024) NOTICE OF ACTION re [43] Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Fred Pool, PEAVEY ELECTRONICS CORPORATION. In all cases filed in, removed, or transferred into this Court, the attorney filing the initiating document need not file a separate entry of appearance. Once the initiating document is filed, any attorney other than the one who filed the initiating document must file a separate entry of appearance before filing a document or appearing before the Court. Attorney Bienstock does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (clw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 08/19/2024)