Rolls Royce North American Technologies Inc
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents609
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L2
B
PTAB
L2
B
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
10/19/22 | ORDER re 68 Joint Stipulation Regarding Settlement and Dismissal With Prejudice filed by ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC, ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - Defendants Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc., Rolls-Royce Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (together, "Rolls-Royce") and Plaintiff Sonic Blue Aerospace, Inc. ("SonicBlue"), hereby respectfully stipulate for the record as follows: 1) On 6/24/20222, the Court entered an order dismissing all claims against Rolls-Royce for lack of personal jurisdiction. See ECF No. 52 . 2) On 7/8/2022, Rolls-Royce moved for fees related to this action. 3) On 10/6/2022, SonicBlue and Rolls-Royce entered into a Settlement Agreement resolving all claims that are the subject of this action, including the Rolls-Royce motion for fees in the above-captioned action. 4) Accordingly, all parties to this action hereby stipulate for the dismissal of this action with prejudice, and, to the extent that the Rolls-Royce motion for fees is not mooted hereby, Rolls-Royce hereby withdraws said motion. 5) Each party to bear its own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED, Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 10/19/2022. (dlg) (Entered: 10/19/2022) | |
10/19/22 | STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Crowson, Celine) (Entered: 10/19/2022) | |
09/12/22 | ORDER - Upon consideration of the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of all claims asserted by Sonic Blue Aerospace, Inc. in this case against Kongsberg Gruppen, ASA, Kongsberg Maritime AS, and Kongsberg Maritime, Inc., and the Court being of the opinion that said motion should be GRANTED, it is ORDERED that all claims asserted in this suit by Sonic Blue Aerospace, Inc. against Kongsberg Gruppen ASA, Kongsberg Maritime AS, and Kongsberg Maritime, Inc. are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of the parties' settlement agreement entitled "SETTLEMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT" and dated September 1, 2022. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys' fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 9/12/2022. (dlg) (Entered: 09/12/2022) | |
09/02/22 | Joint MOTION to Dismiss Re: Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice by KONGSBERG GRUPPEN ASA, KONGSBERG MARITIME AS, KONGSBERG MARITIME, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cohn, Marc) (Entered: 09/02/2022) | |
09/02/22 | NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion by KONGSBERG GRUPPEN ASA, KONGSBERG MARITIME AS, KONGSBERG MARITIME, INC. re 54 Motion for Attorney Fees (Cohn, Marc) (Entered: 09/02/2022) | |
08/01/22 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 56 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Crowson, Celine) (Entered: 08/01/2022) | |
08/01/22 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 54 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by KONGSBERG GRUPPEN ASA, KONGSBERG MARITIME AS, KONGSBERG MARITIME, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration (Second) of Seth Engel, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Cohn, Marc) (Entered: 08/01/2022) | |
07/25/22 | RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to 54 Motion for Attorney Fees, 56 Motion for Attorney Fees, 57 Brief in Support of Motion, 55 Brief in Support of Motion, filed by SONICBLUE AEROSPACE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration) (Zegarelli, Gregg) (Entered: 07/25/2022) | |
07/13/22 | NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Joseph Long on behalf of SONICBLUE AEROSPACE, INC.. (Long, Daniel) (Entered: 07/13/2022) | |
07/11/22 | ORDER OF COURT - Defendants Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc., Rolls-Royce Corporation, and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC having filed a motion for attorneys fees [Doc. 56 ], IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to that motion no later than July 25, 2022. Any reply to the response shall be filed no later than August 1, 2022. No sur-replies are permitted except by leave of court. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 7/11/2022. (dlg) (Entered: 07/11/2022) |