Rosenberger Technologies LLC
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10/18/22 | Joint Status Report, by CommScope Technologies LLC. (Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 10/19/2022 (nms). (Entered: 10/18/2022) | |
| 04/19/22 | ORDER: The above-captioned case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. A joint status report is due no later than six (6) months from the date of this Order. The parties are also instructed to promptly notify the Court when the related litigation has been resolved so this case may be reopened and other appropriate action may be taken. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2022. (nms) | |
| 04/19/22 | ORDER: The above-captioned case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. A joint status report is due no later than six (6) months from the date of this Order. The parties are also instructed to promptly notify the Court when the related litigation has been resolved so this case may be reopened and other appropriate action may be taken. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2022. (nms) (Entered: 04/19/2022) | |
| 04/19/22 | SO ORDERED Granting [192] Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Stay Case. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2022. (nms) | |
| 04/19/22 | SO ORDERED Granting 192 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Stay Case. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2022. (nms) (Entered: 04/19/2022) | |
| 04/19/22 | JOINT Stipulation and Proposed Order to Stay Case, by CommScope Technologies LLC. (Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 4/19/2022 (nms). | |
| 04/19/22 | JOINT Stipulation and Proposed Order to Stay Case, by CommScope Technologies LLC. (Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 4/19/2022 (nms). (Entered: 04/19/2022) | |
| 04/04/22 | CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order No. 2022-2, dated March 14, 2022, "[u]nless otherwise directed by the Court, Magistrate Judges will no longer engage in alternative dispute resolution of patent and securities cases." See also 28 U.S.C. § 652(b). (Taylor, Daniel) | |
| 04/04/22 | CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order No. 2022-2, dated March 14, 2022, "[u]nless otherwise directed by the Court, Magistrate Judges will no longer engage in alternative dispute resolution of patent and securities cases." See also 28 U.S.C. 652(b). (Taylor, Daniel) (Entered: 04/04/2022) | |
| 03/31/22 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Objections and Responses to Seventh Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 17-25) filed by CommScope Technologies LLC.(Farnan, Kelly) |