Safe Foods Corp

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents34

CourtsE.D. Arkansas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/30/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Appeal Fees received $605 receipt number LIT7277 re 128 Notice of Appeal filed by Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc. (jbh) (Entered: 07/30/2024)
07/29/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL forwarded by e-mail to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Certified copies of 82 Order, 118 Order, 119 Judgment, 128 Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet provided. (jbh) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
07/26/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	MANDATE of USCA in accordance with the judgment of 7/26/2024 as to 128 Notice of Appeal filed by Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc. (jbh) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	USCA JUDGMENT as to 128 Notice of Appeal filed by Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc: The notice of appeal was forwarded to this court in error. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby administratively closed. (jbh) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	USCA Docketing Letter as to 128 Notice of Appeal filed by Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc. USCA Case Number 24-2535. (jbh) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/25/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to 128 Notice of Appeal re 82 Order, 118 Order, 119 Judgment. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL: REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS SHOULD BE FILED WITH THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK. (jbh) (Entered: 07/25/2024)
07/25/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 82 Order, 119 Judgment, 118 Order, by Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc. (Ogden, Seth) (Entered: 07/25/2024)
07/09/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	NOTICE by Safe Foods Corporation re 125 Order on Motion for Order,,,, Redacted Defendant's Motion to Redesignate Certain Materials or In The Alternative Modify The Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Filed Under Seal, # 2 Exhibit B Filed Under Seal, # 3 Exhibit C Filed Under Seal, # 4 Exhibit D Filed Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit E Filed Under Seal, # 6 Exhibit F Filed Under Seal, # 7 Exhibit G Filed Under Seal, # 8 Exhibit H Filed Under Seal, # 9 Exhibit I Filed Under Seal, # 10 Exhibit J Filed Under Seal)(Clark, Scott) (Entered: 07/09/2024) NOTICE by Safe Foods Corporation re 125 Order on Motion for Order,,,, Redacted Defendant's Motion to Redesignate Certain Materials or In The Alternative Modify The Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Filed Under Seal, # 2 Exhibit B Filed Under Seal, # 3 Exhibit C Filed Under Seal, # 4 Exhibit D Filed Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit E Filed Under Seal, # 6 Exhibit F Filed Under Seal, # 7 Exhibit G Filed Under Seal, # 8 Exhibit H Filed Under Seal, # 9 Exhibit I Filed Under Seal, # 10 Exhibit J Filed Under Seal)(Clark, Scott) (Entered: 07/09/2024)
07/03/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Kael K. Bowling re 117 Sealed Order. (fjg) (Entered: 07/03/2024)
07/01/24	Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc v. Safe Foods Corp 4:21-CV-00601 ( D. AR )	(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. The Court has received and reviewed Defendant's Motion to Redesignate Certain Materials or in the Alternative Modify the Protective Order. The Court has also received and reviewed Plaintiff's Response to that Motion. The Court notes that Section 13 of the Protective Order (Doc. 34 ) states as follows: "Any party may petition the presiding judge for good cause shown if the party desires relief from a term or condition of this Protective Order." The Court construes Defendant's Motion as, inter alia, a request for relief under this section of the Protective Order. Notwithstanding Section 6(A) of the Protective Order, the Court agrees that there is good cause to allow Defendant to use the documents (and information from these documents) set out in the bullet points on pages 2-3 of the Motion in filing and prosecuting a new Complaint (in a new case), so long as Defendant uses its best efforts to ensure that the documents and associated information are kept confidential by way of sealing the Complaint or portions thereof and sealing any later use of the documents and associated information in that new case. The good cause for this relief is set out in Section III(D) of the Motion. Because the Court's decision allows Defendant to use the documents and associated information to file a new Complaint (in a new case), the Court need not, and will not, address whether the documents and associated information are properly designated as "Confidential Information." Finally, the Court notes that this Order should not be construed as determining the propriety or viability of any Complaint Defendant may choose to file in a new case. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/01/2024. (snb) (Entered: 07/01/2024) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. The Court has received and reviewed Defendant's Motion to Redesignate Certain Materials or in the Alternative Modify the Protective Order. The Court has also received and reviewed Plaintiff's Response to that Motion. The Court notes that Section 13 of the Protective Order (Doc. 34 ) states as follows: "Any party may petition the presiding judge for good cause shown if the party desires relief from a term or condition of this Protective Order." The Court construes Defendant's Motion as, inter alia, a request for relief under this section of the Protective Order. Notwithstanding Section 6(A) of the Protective Order, the Court agrees that there is good cause to allow Defendant to use the documents (and information from these documents) set out in the bullet points on pages 2-3 of the Motion in filing and prosecuting a new Complaint (in a new case), so long as Defendant uses its best efforts to ensure that the documents and associated information are kept confidential by way of sealing the Complaint or portions thereof and sealing any later use of the documents and associated information in that new case. The good cause for this relief is set out in Section III(D) of the Motion. Because the Court's decision allows Defendant to use the documents and associated information to file a new Complaint (in a new case), the Court need not, and will not, address whether the documents and associated information are properly designated as "Confidential Information." Finally, the Court notes that this Order should not be construed as determining the propriety or viability of any Complaint Defendant may choose to file in a new case. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/01/2024. (snb) (Entered: 07/01/2024)