Salesforce Inc

General

Total Cases17

Active Cases8

Patents3,000

CourtsD. Delaware W.D. Texas N.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L3

B

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/07/25	Dialect LLC v. Salesforce Inc 7:25-CV-00061 ( W.D. TX )	RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dialect, LLC. (Stephens, Garland) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/07/25	Dialect LLC v. Salesforce Inc 7:25-CV-00061 ( W.D. TX )	Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Stephens, Garland) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/07/25	Dialect LLC v. Salesforce Inc 7:25-CV-00061 ( W.D. TX )	REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Dialect, LLC. (Stephens, Garland) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/07/25	Dialect LLC v. Salesforce Inc 7:25-CV-00061 ( W.D. TX )	COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-19769335), filed by Dialect, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1, # [2] Exhibit 2, # [3] Appendix A, # [4] Civil Cover Sheet)(Stephens, Garland) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
12/18/24	Applications In Internet Time LLC v. Salesforce Inc 3:13-CV-00628 ( D. NV )	ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to [439] Notice of Appeal, filed by Applications in Internet Time, LLC. Salesforce, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The mandate of the court will issue December 24, 2024. USCA Case Number 24-1685. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 12/18/2024) ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to [439] Notice of Appeal, filed by Applications in Internet Time, LLC. Salesforce, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The mandate of the court will issue December 24, 2024. USCA Case Number 24-1685. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 12/18/2024)
12/06/24	Keysoft Inc v. Salesforce Inc 1:24-CV-00257 ( D. DE )	Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (lnb) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/06/24	Keysoft Inc v. Salesforce Inc 1:24-CV-00257 ( D. DE )	Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (lnb) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/06/24	Keysoft Inc v. Salesforce Inc 1:24-CV-00257 ( D. DE )	ORDER GRANTING re [18] Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by Keysoft, Inc., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/6/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/06/24	Keysoft Inc v. Salesforce Inc 1:24-CV-00257 ( D. DE )	ORDER GRANTING re [18] Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by Keysoft, Inc., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/6/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/04/24	Keysoft Inc v. Salesforce Inc 1:24-CV-00257 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Adam W. Poff regarding Status of Plaintiff's claims for relief - re [18] Joint MOTION to Dismiss. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 12/04/2024)