Shanghai Walk Long Tools Co Ltd

General

Total Cases3
Active Cases--
Patents--
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
01/24/20
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 01/24/2020)
01/24/20
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 26 : Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc. and Defendants Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co., Ltd. and Neocraft Tools Co., Ltd.s stipulation to dismiss this action is approved. Accordingly, all claims and counterclaims in this action are dismissed with prejudice.The Court retains jurisdiction over any disputes arising from any agreementbetween the parties resolving this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 01/24/2020)
01/17/20
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 107 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc. and Defendants Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co., Ltd. and Neocraft Tools Co., Ltd.s stipulation to dismiss this action is approved. Accordingly, all claims and counterclaims in this action are dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es) (Entered: 01/17/2020)
01/17/20
STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 filed by Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Train, Tyler) (Entered: 01/17/2020)
01/17/20
STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 filed by Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Train, Tyler) (Entered: 01/17/2020)
01/10/20
MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Judge S. James Otero:Matter has settled. This settlement closes this case and case number CV 19-05326 PSG: Advantek Marketing, Inc. v. Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co., Ltd. et al.The Court advises the parties that Judge Gutierrez shall retain jurisdiction in each case to enforce the settlement. The Court Orders that the transcript of this proceeding shall be sealed however a copy of the transcript shall be provided to counsel for the parties. The parties shall share the cost of thetranscript. Plaintiffs places the confidential terms of the settlement on the record. The party representative acknowledge and agree to all terms stated.Plaintiff shall lodge a proposed order of dismissal in each case by Tuesday, January 14, 2020. Court Reporter: Lisa Gonzalez. (lc) (Entered: 01/10/2020)
01/09/20
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. NO. 88) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: For reasons of calendar management and judicial economy, the hearing on Defendants summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 88) set for Monday, January 13, 2020 is CONTINUED to Monday, January 27, 2020 at 10:00 am. (es) (Entered: 01/09/2020)
01/09/20
TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12/17/2019 10:18 A.M.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: BABYKIN COURTHOUSE SERVICES, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 1/28/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/7/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/6/2020. (lca) (Entered: 01/09/2020)
01/07/20
MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses 96 filed by Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jaye G. Heybl ISO Advanteks Supplemental Memorandum, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Heybl Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Heybl Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Heybl Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Heybl Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Heybl Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Heybl Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Heybl Declaration)(Train, Tyler) (Entered: 01/07/2020)
01/07/20
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer 23 , for the following reasons: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (bm) (Entered: 01/07/2020)