Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents13

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/19/21	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On February 19, 2021, the parties filed a jointly-signed "Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" 42 explaining that they jointly stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties stipulation and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). The Court notes that, because the notice of dismissal was filed before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case could also properly be dismissed under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Either way, the dismissal is effective. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ef, ) (Entered: 02/19/2021) MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On February 19, 2021, the parties filed a jointly-signed "Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" 42 explaining that they jointly stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties stipulation and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). The Court notes that, because the notice of dismissal was filed before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case could also properly be dismissed under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Either way, the dismissal is effective. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ef, ) (Entered: 02/19/2021)
02/19/21	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	STIPULATION of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE (Freire, Diego) (Entered: 02/19/2021)
08/05/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	REPLY by Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co. Ltd. to response to motion 40 Supporting Motion to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice (McKinley, Danielle) (Entered: 08/05/2020)
07/21/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	RESPONSE by E-Link Technology Co. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendants Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co. Ltd., Magic Hover to dismiss 36 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Pingzhi Li Declaration)(Freire, Diego) (Entered: 07/21/2020)
07/10/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk7, Docket) (Entered: 07/10/2020) ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk7, Docket) (Entered: 07/10/2020)
06/24/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: By agreement of the parties, the Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendants motion to dismiss 36 : Plaintiff shall respond by 7/22/2020 and Defendants shall reply by 8/5/2020. Mailed notice (ef, ) (Entered: 06/24/2020)
06/22/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	CORRECTED ENTRY by Magic Hover (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(McKinley, Danielle) (Entered: 06/22/2020)
06/22/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Defendants Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co. Ltd., Magic Hover to dismiss (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Zhang, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A (Chinese), # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A (English translation), # 4 Declaration Declaration of Vegh)(McKinley, Danielle) (Entered: 06/22/2020)
06/09/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 300, receipt no. 0752-17084861; 0752-17084919, (Vegh, Stephen) (Entered: 06/09/2020)
06/09/20	E Link Technology Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co Ltd 1:19-CV-08468 ( N.D. IL )	ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Magic Hover by Stephen Z. Vegh Attorney Appearance for Shenzhen Oula Zhizhao Technology Co., Ltd, d/b/a Magic Hover (Vegh, Stephen) (Entered: 06/09/2020)