Shenzhen Willsea E Commerce Co Ltd

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents2

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/16/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to stay [41] and stays this matter pending settlement. The Court strikes the telephonic status date set for 10/31/2024 and resets it to 11/20/2024 at 9:30 AM. If the parties file a stipulation of dismissal prior to the next status date, no appearance is required. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 10/16/2024)
10/15/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SHENZHEN JISU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD of Defendants Gorbiller, ZZCP Direct US, KinYiLO, AIBIX, Dtosbv, Geolinca, HWYC_Azon, Mebemporiums, River K, Trutru, Vial-Gong, YeFungHe, Yibin Shugang Metal Products Co., Ltd, YiLin-Commerce, and Zwang (Moore, Stevenson) (Entered: 10/15/2024)
10/14/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of Motion by Nicholas Edward Najera for presentment of motion to stay [41] before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 10/17/2024 at 01:45 PM. (Najera, Nicholas) (Entered: 10/14/2024)
10/14/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Plaintiff SHENZHEN JISU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD to stay pending settlement (Najera, Nicholas) (Entered: 10/14/2024)
10/04/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Telephone conference held on 10/2/2024. Plaintiff reports that there are 13 remaining defendants. Plaintiff's oral motion for additional time to post bond by 10/11/2024 is granted. Telephone Conference set for 10/31/2024 at 1:45 PM for entry of default and default judgment and settlement with Defendant Slenpet. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 10/04/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Telephone conference held on 10/2/2024. Plaintiff reports that there are 13 remaining defendants. Plaintiff's oral motion for additional time to post bond by 10/11/2024 is granted. Telephone Conference set for 10/31/2024 at 1:45 PM for entry of default and default judgment and settlement with Defendant Slenpet. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 10/04/2024)
10/01/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies Jisu's motion for a preliminary injunction against SLENPET [13] without prejudice. The Court dissolves the TRO against SLENPET. The Court denies SLENPET's motion for damages [19] without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 10/1/2024. Mailed notice(rj, ) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
09/27/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants in part Defendant SLENPET's motion to modify the temporary restraining order bond amount [28] . A "court may issue a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained." Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). "The appropriate amount of the bond is subject to the court's discretion." Monster Energy Co. v. Wensheng, 136 F. Supp. 3d 897, 910 (N.D. Ill. 2015). "[W]hen setting the amount of security, district courts should err on the high side." Mead Johnson & Co. v. Abbott Lab'ys, 201 F.3d 883, 888 (7th Cir. 2000). In this case, the Court initially required a $1,000 bond. Having reviewed Plaintiff's and SLENPET's arguments concerning the proper bond amount, the Court finds it appropriate to increase the bond amount in this case to $370,000, which takes into account the number of defendants Plaintiff initially sued and the potential damages they may have incurred under the temporary restraining order in this case. The Court thus orders Plaintiff to deposit with the Court an additional $369,000, either cash or security bond, as security within seven (7) calendar days of this order. Status date set for 10/2/2024 at 9:30 a.m. on Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against SLENPET [13] and SLENPET's motion for damages [28] to stand. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 09/27/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants in part Defendant SLENPET's motion to modify the temporary restraining order bond amount [28] . A "court may issue a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained." Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). "The appropriate amount of the bond is subject to the court's discretion." Monster Energy Co. v. Wensheng, 136 F. Supp. 3d 897, 910 (N.D. Ill. 2015). "[W]hen setting the amount of security, district courts should err on the high side." Mead Johnson & Co. v. Abbott Lab'ys, 201 F.3d 883, 888 (7th Cir. 2000). In this case, the Court initially required a $1,000 bond. Having reviewed Plaintiff's and SLENPET's arguments concerning the proper bond amount, the Court finds it appropriate to increase the bond amount in this case to $370,000, which takes into account the number of defendants Plaintiff initially sued and the potential damages they may have incurred under the temporary restraining order in this case. The Court thus orders Plaintiff to deposit with the Court an additional $369,000, either cash or security bond, as security within seven (7) calendar days of this order. Status date set for 10/2/2024 at 9:30 a.m. on Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against SLENPET [13] and SLENPET's motion for damages [28] to stand. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/13/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The telephonic ruling date set for 9/18/2024 is stricken and reset to 10/2/2024 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 09/13/2024)
08/28/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SHENZHEN JISU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD of Defendant Right Well (Moore, Stevenson) (Entered: 08/28/2024)
08/26/24	Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-04152 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report by SHENZHEN JISU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (Moore, Stevenson) (Entered: 08/26/2024)