Singulus Technologies Inc

General

Total Cases3

Active Cases--

Patents43

CourtsD. Connecticut E.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

singulus-technologies

singulus-technologies

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/23/23	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	AO 120 Report on the Determination of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 01/23/2023)
01/23/23	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 01/23/2023) JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 01/23/2023)
01/20/23	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Crossford International, LLC, Goodway Technologies Corporation (Sharinn, Todd) (Entered: 01/20/2023)
12/21/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	ORDER. The Court has reviewed the file in this case to monitor the Plaintiffs' compliance with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 4(m) provides, in part, that if service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within ninety (90) days after the filing of the complaint, the court, after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice or direct that service be effected within a specified and appropriate time, provided the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure. An executed return of service upon any of the named defendants has not been filed in ninety (90) days. Indeed, it does not appear that the Plaintiffs have requested the Clerk of the Court to issue summonses. The Plaintiffs are hereby put on notice that, in the absence of satisfactory compliance with Rule 4(m) within THIRTY (30) days, the Court shall enter a dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/21/2022.(Gould, K.) (Entered: 12/21/2022) ORDER. The Court has reviewed the file in this case to monitor the Plaintiffs' compliance with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 4(m) provides, in part, that if service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within ninety (90) days after the filing of the complaint, the court, after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice or direct that service be effected within a specified and appropriate time, provided the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure. An executed return of service upon any of the named defendants has not been filed in ninety (90) days. Indeed, it does not appear that the Plaintiffs have requested the Clerk of the Court to issue summonses. The Plaintiffs are hereby put on notice that, in the absence of satisfactory compliance with Rule 4(m) within THIRTY (30) days, the Court shall enter a dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/21/2022.(Gould, K.) (Entered: 12/21/2022)
08/29/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 4 Protective Order, 5 Order, 6 Report on Patent/Trademark Form, 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 1 Complaint, filed by Goodway Technologies Corporation, Crossford International, LLC, 3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 8/29/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022) NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 4 Protective Order, 5 Order, 6 Report on Patent/Trademark Form, 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 1 Complaint, filed by Goodway Technologies Corporation, Crossford International, LLC, 3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 8/29/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022)
08/29/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent Form Completed. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022)
08/29/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	Standing Order in Patent Cases Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022)
08/29/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022)
08/29/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022)
08/29/22	Crossford Intl LLC v. Keith Handy Design Ltd 3:22-CV-01083 ( D. CT )	Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/25/2022 Discovery due by 2/25/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 4/1/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Entered: 08/29/2022)