Sojag Inc
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
02/10/25 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sojag Inc. answer now due 3/14/2025, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) [1] filed by Defendant Sojag Inc..(Attorney Derrick F Coleman added to party Sojag Inc.(pty:dft))(Coleman, Derrick) (Entered: 02/10/2025) | |
01/31/25 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd., upon Defendant Sojag Inc. served on 1/22/2025, answer due 2/12/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mr. Sebastien Victoria, Distribution Center Manager in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified (Attachments: # [1] Original Untranslated Proof of Service)(Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 01/31/2025) | |
01/24/25 | STATUS REPORT re: Service of Summons and Complaint filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A)(Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 01/24/2025) | |
01/17/25 | (IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO SOJAG INC. (DKT. [14] ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Response by Plaintiff to OSC Regarding Continued Order to Show Cause (Dkt. [17] ), good cause has been shown as to the request for additional time to serve Defendant, Sojag Inc. Accordingly, the OSC Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution as to Sojag Inc. (Dkt. [14] ) is discharged. On or before January 24, 2025, Plaintiff shall submit a status report as to any update from the Quebec Central Authority as to timing of the service of Defendant, Sojag Inc. Based on a review of the status report, a determination will be made as to the deadline for the service of process to be completed. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mhk) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/17/2025) | |
12/30/24 | RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.to Text Only Scheduling Notice, 16 (Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 12/30/2024) | |
10/30/24 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (DKT. [14] ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of filing of the Response on October 28, 2024 (Dkt. [15] ) the Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution is CONTINUED to December 30, 2024. No further continuances are allowed.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/30/2024) | |
10/28/24 | RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,,, [14] to Order to Show Cause (Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 10/28/2024) | |
10/21/24 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO SOJAG INC. by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than October 28, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). In light of the filing of the complaint date of July 17, 2024, proof(s) of service were due by October 17, 2024. An action may also be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 10/21/2024) | |
07/29/24 | STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) (Entered: 07/29/2024) | |
07/26/24 | ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:24-cv-00331 JAK(MAAx). Case transferred from Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-06020 JAK(MAAx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (rn) (Entered: 07/26/2024) |