Substructure Support Inc
General
Total Cases3
Active Cases--
Patents--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10/05/20 | MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals [141] , CCA # 2020-1132. In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered August 27, 2020, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued. Costs are awarded to appellees Foundation Constructors Inc. and Foundation Pile Inc. in the amount of $33.60 and taxed against the appellants Steve Neville, Substructure Support Inc. , and TDP Support Inc. [See USCA JUDGMENT [156] , USCA Memorandum [155] ](mat) | |
| 10/05/20 | MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 141 , CCA # 2020-1132. In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered August 27, 2020, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued. Costs are awarded to appellees Foundation Constructors, Inc. and Foundation Pile, Inc. in the amount of $33.60 and taxed against the appellants Steve Neville, Substructure Support, Inc., and TDP Support, Inc. [See USCA JUDGMENT 156 , USCA Memorandum 155 ](mat) (Entered: 10/05/2020) | |
| 08/27/20 | Federal Judgment from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals filed, NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. CCA # 2020-1132. THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (mat) | |
| 08/27/20 | OPINION from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals filed, [141] NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. CCA # 2020-1132. For the reasons stated above, we affirm the district courts claim constructions and ruling at summary judgment of noninfringement as to the ED2M/ED3 pile tip. AFFIRMED (mat) | |
| 04/17/20 | Costs | |
| 04/17/20 | BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $10,495.58 in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. RE: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs re: Judgment, [135] , [137] (kr) | |
| 12/02/19 | MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Considering the totality of the circumstances, Defendants have not shown that Plaintiffs' conduct was exceptional in a way that warrants fees, particularly when measured against Defendants' own conduct in prosecuting this case. The Court DENIES the motion. (See order for further details.) (es) | |
| 12/02/19 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # [1] Judgment) (es) | |
| 12/02/19 | MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES [140] Motion Hearing held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Hearing held. Court hears oral argument. For the reasons stated on the record, the tentative shall become the Order of the Court. Order to issue. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (es) | |
| 11/17/19 | NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 10/24/18 & 8/19/19 re Transcript [149] , [148] THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Baird, Miriam) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |