Sunglasses Factory Store

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/19/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 41 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 08/19/2022)
04/19/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	RETURN of U.S. Post Office Receipt, article no. 7019 2280 0000 0962 6800. (jg, ) (Entered: 04/19/2022)
04/08/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 41 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendants (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 04/08/2022)
03/30/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED original ten-thousand-dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Oakley, Inc., Amy Crout Ziegler of Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 300 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 Chicago IL. 60606 via certified mail # 7019 2280 0000 0962 6800. (jn, ) (Entered: 03/30/2022)
03/25/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 41 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 03/25/2022)
03/15/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED patent report with certified copy of order dated 3/10/2022 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (jn, ) (Entered: 03/15/2022)
03/11/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 41 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendants (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 03/11/2022)
03/10/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Plaintiff is hereby released to Plaintiff or its counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to Plaintiff or its counsel, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd., 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606, via certified mail. Mailed notice (ef, ) (Entered: 03/10/2022) MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Plaintiff is hereby released to Plaintiff or its counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to Plaintiff or its counsel, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd., 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606, via certified mail. Mailed notice (ef, ) (Entered: 03/10/2022)
03/10/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/10/2022. Mailed notice(ef, ) (Entered: 03/10/2022)
03/10/22	Oakley Inc v. Wenzhou Yazhou Glasses Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06095 ( N.D. IL )	ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/10/2022: No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff`s motion for entry of default judgment, despite the Court having provided them with the opportunity to do so. See Dkt. 38. Accordingly, the motion 35 is granted. Because Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois, this Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants. Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass`n v. P`ships & Unincorporated Ass`ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 934 (N.D. Ill. 2016). Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction is warranted, and Plaintiff is awarded profits from Defendants based on their infringing conduct. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(ef, ) (Entered: 03/10/2022) ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/10/2022: No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff`s motion for entry of default judgment, despite the Court having provided them with the opportunity to do so. See Dkt. 38. Accordingly, the motion 35 is granted. Because Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois, this Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants. Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass`n v. P`ships & Unincorporated Ass`ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 934 (N.D. Ill. 2016). Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction is warranted, and Plaintiff is awarded profits from Defendants based on their infringing conduct. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(ef, ) (Entered: 03/10/2022)