The Glass Door Company Inc

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/04/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	STATEMENT JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PREHEARING STATEMENT (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction Statement, # 2 Exhibit B to Joint Claim Construction Statement, # 3 Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction Statement, # 4 Exhibit D to Joint Claim Construction Statement.pdf)(Doroshow, James) (Entered: 08/04/2023)
07/14/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: granting 71 Non-Resident Attorney Kathleen A. Johnson APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of The Glass Door Company, Inc., designating James E. Doroshow as local counsel. (lom) (Entered: 07/14/2023)
07/11/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF No. 53) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi denying 53 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: The motion is denied. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 07/11/2023)
07/07/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kathleen A. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35625569) filed by defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit - Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order re Pro Hac Vice Application) (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 07/07/2023)
06/30/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 (Amended) filed by Plaintiff The Sliding Door Company. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Fletcher (Amended) in Response to Defendant's Amended Opposition and Amended Declaration of Mr. Lustig, # 2 Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Amended Declaration of Mr. Lustig, # 3 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Amended Declaration of Mr. Lustig)(Ludwig, Frederic) (Entered: 06/30/2023) REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 (Amended) filed by Plaintiff The Sliding Door Company. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Fletcher (Amended) in Response to Defendant's Amended Opposition and Amended Declaration of Mr. Lustig, # 2 Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Amended Declaration of Mr. Lustig, # 3 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Amended Declaration of Mr. Lustig)(Ludwig, Frederic) (Entered: 06/30/2023)
06/23/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	(REDLINED) AMENDED DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 re DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [57-3] filed by Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 06/23/2023) (REDLINED) AMENDED DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 re DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [57-3] filed by Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 06/23/2023)
06/23/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	AMENDED DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 re DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [57-3] filed by Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 06/23/2023) AMENDED DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 re DECLARATION OF DAVID LUSTIG IN SUPPORT OF DOORS22'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF THE SLIDING DOORS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [57-3] filed by Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 06/23/2023)
06/23/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	(Redlined) Defendant Doors22's Amended Opposition to Plaintiff The Sliding Doors Companys Motion for Preliminary Injunction re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 re Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 57 filed by Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 06/23/2023)
06/23/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	Defendant Doors22's Amended Opposition to Plaintiff The Sliding Doors Companys Motion for Preliminary Injunction re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Trade Dress and Patent Infringement 53 Re Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 57 filed by Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc.. (Doroshow, James) (Entered: 06/23/2023)
06/23/23	Sliding Door Co v. Glass Door Co Inc 2:22-CV-07500 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO CLARIFY RECORD 62 . Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc., d/b/a Doors 22, applies ex parte for an order authorizing it to amend its papers opposing a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff The Sliding Door Company. Defendant submits that counsel determined in discovery that some representations made in its brief were not true, and amendments are intended to correct attendant errors.Plaintiff opposes the application. The application is DENIED for failure to justify relief on an ex parte basis. Defendant fails to show how its case would be irreparably harmed if the Court does not authorize the papers to be corrected on an emergency basis (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). However, counsel have wasted their clients'and the Court'stime andresources ventilating an unnecessary ex parte application, so the Court OFFERS THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION. Defendant forthwith shall file the amended documents and redlines attached as Exhibits 25 to the declaration of James Doroshow separately on the docket as amended opposition papers. Plaintiff may file amended reply papers WITHIN SEVEN DAYS. The Court will consider the amended papers to resolve the motion. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the motion will STAND SUBMITTED without a hearing 53 . The Court declines to decide at this juncture whether sanctions should be imposed for either partys needless multiplication of these proceedings. (lc) (Entered: 06/23/2023) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO CLARIFY RECORD 62 . Defendant The Glass Door Company, Inc., d/b/a Doors 22, applies ex parte for an order authorizing it to amend its papers opposing a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff The Sliding Door Company. Defendant submits that counsel determined in discovery that some representations made in its brief were not true, and amendments are intended to correct attendant errors.Plaintiff opposes the application. The application is DENIED for failure to justify relief on an ex parte basis. Defendant fails to show how its case would be irreparably harmed if the Court does not authorize the papers to be corrected on an emergency basis (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). However, counsel have wasted their clients'and the Court'stime andresources ventilating an unnecessary ex parte application, so the Court OFFERS THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION. Defendant forthwith shall file the amended documents and redlines attached as Exhibits 25 to the declaration of James Doroshow separately on the docket as amended opposition papers. Plaintiff may file amended reply papers WITHIN SEVEN DAYS. The Court will consider the amended papers to resolve the motion. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the motion will STAND SUBMITTED without a hearing 53 . The Court declines to decide at this juncture whether sanctions should be imposed for either partys needless multiplication of these proceedings. (lc) (Entered: 06/23/2023)