Tii Trading Inc
General
Total Cases3
Active Cases--
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
02/25/22 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES PENDING APPEAL OF INTER PARTES REVIEW DECISION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Court hereby orders all pending dates in this matter remain stayed while NOCO pursues its appeal of the Board's finding that claims 1- 10 and 12-23 of the '015 Patent are unpatentable. The parties are ordered to advise the Court within 5 Court days following resolution of NOCO's appeal to the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) | |
02/24/22 | Second STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Pending Decision by United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit of Decision by U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board filed by Plaintiff The NOCO Company Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES PENDING APPEAL OF INTER PARTES REVIEW DECISION)(Attorney Mark D Peterson added to party The NOCO Company Inc. (pty:pla))(Peterson, Mark) | |
11/18/20 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES PENDING FINAL DECISION OF INTER PARTIES REVIEW by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez [56] . The Court having considered the stipulation, the Court hereby orders all pending dates in this matter to be stayed pending the final decision of IPR2020-00944. The case may be reopened by application of any party. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) | |
11/17/20 | Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Pending Final Decision of Inter Partes Review filed by Defendant TII Trading Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A to Joint Stipulation to Stay Pretrial And Trial Dates, # [2] Proposed Order)(Karish, Marc) | |
10/28/20 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OFPRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez [54] . the Court herebyorders a sixty (60) day continuance of all pending dates in this matter. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/24/2021 02:30 at PM. The jury trial is set for 6/15/2021 at 9:00 AM. (See Order for further details) (yl) | |
10/27/20 | Joint STIPULATION to Continue Pretrial and Trial Dates from March 29, 2021 and April 13. 2021 to May 28, 2021 and June 14, 2021 Re: Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines, [37] filed by Defendant TII Trading Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation of Continuance of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Karish, Marc) | |
10/19/20 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kathleen O Peterson counsel for Plaintiff The NOCO Company Inc. . Patrick R. Akers is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff The NOCO Company Inc. . (Peterson, Kathleen) | |
10/06/20 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) The Court CONSTRUES the Disputed Claim Terms as Stated Herein by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, thus the Court VACATES the Claim Construction Hearing presently set for October 12, 2020. Having considered the moving papers and the arguments presented, the Court CONSTRUES the disputed claim terms as stated herein. (See minutes for further details) (yl) | |
09/29/20 | ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TII TRADING INC.'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO USE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS AT THE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING [48] by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Before this Court is Defendant TII Trading Inc. 's Application for leave to use demonstrative exhibits, namely certain PowerPoint slides attached to its Application and samples of its accused NO2 and G33A products, at the claim construction hearing. The request is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) | |
09/29/20 | ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S THE NOCO COMPANY, INC.'S REQUEST For Permission to Use Demonstrative Evidence At Claim Construction Hearing [46] by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (yl) |