Toyo Tire Corp

General

Total Cases3

Active Cases1

Patents488

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

toyotires.co.jp

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/30/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Toyo's motions to seal documents [791] and [792] are granted. Mailed notice. (dm, ) (Entered: 09/30/2022)
09/28/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	SEALED DOCUMENT by Counter Defendants Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp., Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 14, # [2] Exhibit 15)(Dodd, Kimberly) (Entered: 09/28/2022)
09/28/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Counter Defendants Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp., Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. to seal exhibits to stipulation (Attachments: # [1] Stipulation To Supplement Record on Appeal, # [2] Exhibit 9, # [3] Exhibit 10, # [4] Exhibit 11, # [5] Exhibit 12, # [6] Exhibit 13, # [7] Exhibit 14 (Public Version), # [8] Exhibit 15 (Public Version))(Dodd, Kimberly) (Entered: 09/28/2022) MOTION by Counter Defendants Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp., Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. to seal exhibits to stipulation (Attachments: # [1] Stipulation To Supplement Record on Appeal, # [2] Exhibit 9, # [3] Exhibit 10, # [4] Exhibit 11, # [5] Exhibit 12, # [6] Exhibit 13, # [7] Exhibit 14 (Public Version), # [8] Exhibit 15 (Public Version))(Dodd, Kimberly) (Entered: 09/28/2022)
09/28/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Counter Defendants Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp., Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. to seal exhibits to stipulation (Attachments: # [1] Stipulation To Supplement the Record on Appeal, # [2] Exhibit 1, # [3] Exhibit 2, # [4] Exhibit 3, # [5] Exhibit 4, # [6] Exhibit 5, # [7] Exhibit 6, # [8] Exhibit 7, # [9] Exhibit 8)(Dodd, Kimberly) (Entered: 09/28/2022) MOTION by Counter Defendants Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp., Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. to seal exhibits to stipulation (Attachments: # [1] Stipulation To Supplement the Record on Appeal, # [2] Exhibit 1, # [3] Exhibit 2, # [4] Exhibit 3, # [5] Exhibit 4, # [6] Exhibit 5, # [7] Exhibit 6, # [8] Exhibit 7, # [9] Exhibit 8)(Dodd, Kimberly) (Entered: 09/28/2022)
06/08/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	TRANSMITTED to the Federal Circuit the short record on notice of appeal [789] . Notified counsel (jmk, ) (Entered: 06/08/2022)
06/07/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of appeal by Atturo Tire Corporation regarding orders [760] , [761] Filing fee $ 505, receipt number AILNDC-19538542. Receipt number: n (Bianco, Brian) (Entered: 06/07/2022)
06/07/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Before the Court is Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Toyo's motion to stay execution of the Court's Judgment against Toyo pending appeal and to waive the requirement of a supersedeas bond. In its discretion, a district court may waive the bond requirement. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 62(d); Dillon v. City of Chi., 866 F.2d 902 (7th Cir. 1988). Toyo argues that the first four Dillon factors favor waiving the bond requirement: (1) the complexity of the collection process; (2) the amount of time required to obtain a judgment after it is affirmed on appeal; (3) the degree of confidence that the district court has in the availability of Toyo's funds to pay the judgment; and (4) whether "the [judgment debtor's] ability to pay the judgment is so plain that the cost of a bond would be a waste of money". Dillon, 866 F.2d at 904-05. Atturo responds that: In reliance on the financial information contained in Toyo's motion, including the sworn representation of Toyo's Controller that Toyo "could wire the full amount of any judgment to Atturo within ten business days of an affirmance on appeal", Atturo does not oppose Toyo's motion. [787] . The Court finds that a stay of execution of the judgment and waiver of the bond are warranted. Accordingly, Toyo's motion [783, 784] is granted. Mailed notice. (dm, ) (Entered: 06/07/2022) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Before the Court is Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Toyo's motion to stay execution of the Court's Judgment against Toyo pending appeal and to waive the requirement of a supersedeas bond. In its discretion, a district court may waive the bond requirement. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 62(d); Dillon v. City of Chi., 866 F.2d 902 (7th Cir. 1988). Toyo argues that the first four Dillon factors favor waiving the bond requirement: (1) the complexity of the collection process; (2) the amount of time required to obtain a judgment after it is affirmed on appeal; (3) the degree of confidence that the district court has in the availability of Toyo's funds to pay the judgment; and (4) whether "the [judgment debtor's] ability to pay the judgment is so plain that the cost of a bond would be a waste of money". Dillon, 866 F.2d at 904-05. Atturo responds that: In reliance on the financial information contained in Toyo's motion, including the sworn representation of Toyo's Controller that Toyo "could wire the full amount of any judgment to Atturo within ten business days of an affirmance on appeal", Atturo does not oppose Toyo's motion. [787] . The Court finds that a stay of execution of the judgment and waiver of the bond are warranted. Accordingly, Toyo's motion [783, 784] is granted. Mailed notice. (dm, ) (Entered: 06/07/2022)
06/06/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	RESPONSE by Atturo Tire Corporation to MOTION by Plaintiff Toyo Tire Corporation, Counter Defendant Toyo Tire Corporation to stay re Execution Pending Appeal Without Supersedeas Bond [783] (Bianco, Brian) (Entered: 06/06/2022)
06/01/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Before the Court is Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Toyo's motion to stay execution of the Court's Judgment against Toyo pending appeal and to waive the requirement of a supersedeas bond. The Court has reviewed the motion and its attachments including the sworn declaration of Toyo's controller. In its discretion, a district court may waive the bond requirement. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 62(d); Dillon v. City of Chi., 866 F.2d 902, 904-05 (7th Cir. 1988) (waiver of bond requirement was appropriate because the City had the funds to pay the judgment and had a process by which the judgment would be paid quickly following the appeal). If Atturo has a valid reason to oppose the motion, it should file its opposition by 6/6/22, limited to 5 pages. Toyo's motion to seal [782] is granted. Mailed notice. (dm, ) (Entered: 06/01/2022) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Before the Court is Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Toyo's motion to stay execution of the Court's Judgment against Toyo pending appeal and to waive the requirement of a supersedeas bond. The Court has reviewed the motion and its attachments including the sworn declaration of Toyo's controller. In its discretion, a district court may waive the bond requirement. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 62(d); Dillon v. City of Chi., 866 F.2d 902, 904-05 (7th Cir. 1988) (waiver of bond requirement was appropriate because the City had the funds to pay the judgment and had a process by which the judgment would be paid quickly following the appeal). If Atturo has a valid reason to oppose the motion, it should file its opposition by 6/6/22, limited to 5 pages. Toyo's motion to seal [782] is granted. Mailed notice. (dm, ) (Entered: 06/01/2022)
05/31/22	Toyo Tire Corp v. Atturo Tire Corp 1:14-CV-00206 ( N.D. IL )	MEMORANDUM motion to stay [783] by Toyo Tire Corporation re Execution Pending Appeal Without Supersedeas Bond (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A, # [2] Exhibit B, # [3] Exhibit C)(Lowrie, Matthew) (Entered: 05/31/2022)