UATP IP LLC

General

Total Cases3
Active Cases2
Patents--
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
07/12/24
ANSWER/REPLY to 19 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by UATP IP, LLC.(Barker, David) (Entered: 07/12/2024)
07/09/24
SCHEDULING ORDER: Proposed Protective Orders and ESI Protocol due 7/30/2024. Inspection of the 360 Air Coaster to be conducted by 8/30/2024. Infringement Contentions due 9/23/2024 with response due 11/4/2024. Join Parties due 12/1/2024.Invalidity Contentions due 12/16/2024 with response due 1/27/2025. Opinion of Counsel due 2/3/2025. List of Claim Terms due 2/14/2025. Joint Disputed Claim Term Chart due 3/24/2025. Claim Construction Brief due 4/21/2025 with response due 5/12/2025 and reply due 5/26/2025. Proposed month for Construction Hearing: June 2025. Final Infringement Contentions due 28 days after Court's Claim Construction Order. Final Invalidity Claims due 21 days after receiving Final Infringement Contentions. Fact discovery deadline: 90 days after Court's Claim Construction Order. Affirmative expert disclosure due on or before 90 days after Court's Claim Construction Order. Rebuttal expert disclosure due on or before six (6) weeks after receipt of opening expert reports. Expert discovery deadline is 30 days after deadline to serve rebuttal expert reports. Ten days after the close of discovery, any party seeking to file a motion for summary judgment must email Judge Rodriguezs chambers (Rodriguez_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov) to inform the Court of their intent to file such motion. If no party seeks to file a summary judgment motion, Counsel shall jointly email chambers to obtain dates for trial and a trial preparation conference. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 7/9/2024. (evaug ) Modified on 7/10/2024 (evaug, ). (Entered: 07/09/2024)
07/01/24
Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff UATP IP, LLC, Counter Defendant UATP IP, LLC. (Barker, David) (Entered: 07/01/2024)
06/24/24
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Schatz, Brett) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/24/24
ANSWER to 1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against UATP IP, LLC by Ascent Airparks, LLC.(Schatz, Brett) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/24/24
ANSWER to 1 Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against UATP IP, LLC by Ascent Airparks, LLC.(Schatz, Brett) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/24/24
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brett A. Schatz on behalf of Ascent Airparks, LLC (Schatz, Brett) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/05/24
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 6/5/2024. Text Only Entry (rmrja) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
06/05/24
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 6/5/2024. Text Only Entry (rmrja) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
06/03/24
CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to 15 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All parties do not consent. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-01212-RMR. (Text Only Entry) (schap, ) (Entered: 06/03/2024)