US Philips Corp

General

Total Cases126

Active Cases17

Patents19

CourtsC.D. California S.D. New York D. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L5

A

PTAB

L5

A

CAFC

L4

B

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/04/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	Letter. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2021) (Entered: 10/04/2021)
07/06/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US9436809 in IPR2021-00327, IPR2021-00370
03/29/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 1014 Stipulation Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Proposed Order. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021) (Entered: 03/29/2021)
03/29/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 1013 Joint Request to Vacate Order Regarding Conditional Dismissal Dated January 29, 2021.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021) (Entered: 03/29/2021)
03/26/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	Stipulated Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Proposed Order filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., U.S. Philips Corporation., Asustek Computer, Inc., and ASUS Computer International. (Holland, Christopher) (Filed on 3/26/2021) Modified on 3/29/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/26/2021)
03/26/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	Joint Request to Vacate Order Regarding Conditional Dismissal Dated January 29, 2021 filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., U.S. Philips Corporation, Asustek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International. (Holland, Christopher) (Filed on 3/26/2021) Modified on 3/29/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/26/2021)
01/29/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 1011 STIPULATION REGARDING CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL.(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) (Entered: 01/29/2021)
01/28/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Conditional Dismissal filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., U.S. Philips Corporation, ASUS Computer International, and Asustek Computer, Inc.. (Holland, Christopher) (Filed on 1/28/2021) Modified on 1/29/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/28/2021)
01/26/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Further Case Management Conference held on 1/26/2021.Total Time in Court: 6 minutes. Court Reporter: Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Christopher Holland, John Carlin, Michael Sandonato. Defendant Attorney: Aaron Maurer, Michael Newton. The parties are to submit a statement by close of business on 1/29/2021 stating whether the parties are in agreement with the entry of a 60-day conditional dismissal. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/26/2021) (Entered: 01/26/2021) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Further Case Management Conference held on 1/26/2021.Total Time in Court: 6 minutes. Court Reporter: Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Christopher Holland, John Carlin, Michael Sandonato. Defendant Attorney: Aaron Maurer, Michael Newton. The parties are to submit a statement by close of business on 1/29/2021 stating whether the parties are in agreement with the entry of a 60-day conditional dismissal. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/26/2021) (Entered: 01/26/2021)
01/19/21	In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation 4:18-CV-01885 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Dkt. No. 1006 Joint Motion for Stay Pending Completion of Settlement Agreement. All deadlines and calendar dates are stayed except for the January 26, 2021 case management conference, which will remain on calendar so that the Court can discuss with the parties whether a conditional dismissal may be appropriate. No case management statement is required. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) (Entered: 01/19/2021) ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Dkt. No. 1006 Joint Motion for Stay Pending Completion of Settlement Agreement. All deadlines and calendar dates are stayed except for the January 26, 2021 case management conference, which will remain on calendar so that the Court can discuss with the parties whether a conditional dismissal may be appropriate. No case management statement is required. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) (Entered: 01/19/2021)