Uv Partners Inc
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 12/13/22 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered based on settlement notification. Case terminated on 12/13/22. Deadline to reinstate: within 60 days from the date of this order. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) (Entered: 12/13/2022) | |
| 12/09/22 | Joint MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement by UV Partners, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/30/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Miranda) (Entered: 12/09/2022) | |
| 12/07/22 | MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: The court grants Proximity's motion, (Docket Entry No. 72), for summary judgment based on the effective filing date, the intervening art, and the on-sale bar. The court finds the present record inadequate to decide, but need not reach, Proximity's motion, (Docket Entry No. 73), for summary judgment based on 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, and therefore denies it without prejudice as moot for the purpose of the issues before the court. The claims by UV Partners for infringement of the 699 Patent are dismissed.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) (Entered: 12/07/2022) | |
| 12/07/22 | MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: The court grants Proximity's motion, (Docket Entry No. 72), for summary judgment based on the effective filing date, the intervening art, and the on-sale bar. The court finds the present record inadequate to decide, but need not reach, Proximity's motion, (Docket Entry No. 73), for summary judgment based on 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, and therefore denies it without prejudice as moot for the purpose of the issues before the court. The claims by UV Partners for infringement of the 699 Patent are dismissed.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) (Entered: 12/07/2022) | |
| 10/27/22 | REPLY to Response to 72 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff UV Partners for Invalidity of '699 Patent Based on Effective Filing Date and Intervening Art and On-Sale Bar, filed by Proximity Systems, Inc.. (Anderson, David) (Entered: 10/27/2022) | |
| 10/27/22 | REPLY to Response to 73 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff UV Partners for Invalidity of '699 Patent Based on 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, filed by Proximity Systems, Inc.. (Anderson, David) (Entered: 10/27/2022) | |
| 10/27/22 | REPLY to Response to 73 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff UV Partners for Invalidity of '699 Patent Based on 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, filed by Proximity Systems, Inc.. (Anderson, David) (Entered: 10/27/2022) | |
| 10/25/22 | AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER granting 78 Joint MOTION to Amend 68 Docket Control Order. Pltf Expert Report due by 11/9/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 12/12/2022. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (ClaudiaGutierrez, 4) (Entered: 10/25/2022) | |
| 10/24/22 | Joint MOTION to Amend 68 Docket Control Order, by Proximity Systems, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/14/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, David) (Entered: 10/24/2022) | |
| 10/20/22 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 72 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff UV Partners for Invalidity of '699 Patent Based on Effective Filing Date and Intervening Art and On-Sale Bar, filed by UV Partners, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Jones, Miranda) (Entered: 10/20/2022) |