VF Outdoor Inc

General

Total Cases17

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsE.D. Texas N.D. California D. Colorado

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L1

D

PTAB

L2

C

CAFC

L2

E

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/05/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Columbia Sportswear Company and VF Outdoor, LLC and against Plaintiff Cocona, Inc. pursuant to [182] Order, by Clerk on 2/5/2025. (ebuch) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Columbia Sportswear Company and VF Outdoor, LLC and against Plaintiff Cocona, Inc. pursuant to [182] Order, by Clerk on 2/5/2025. (ebuch) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	ORDER: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants VF Outdoor, LLC, and Columbia Sportswear Company, and against Plaintiff pursuant to the Amended Order on Claim Construction [176] only on the asserted claims in these matters, by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/5/2025. (ebuch) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	ORDER: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants VF Outdoor, LLC, and Columbia Sportswear Company, and against Plaintiff pursuant to the Amended Order on Claim Construction [176] only on the asserted claims in these matters, by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/5/2025. (ebuch) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/03/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 180 by Counter Defendant Cocona, Inc., Plaintiff Cocona, Inc.. (Nitta, Chad) (Entered: 02/03/2025)
02/03/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 180 by Counter Defendant Cocona, Inc., Plaintiff Cocona, Inc.. (Nitta, Chad) (Entered: 02/03/2025)
01/28/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This matter is before the Court on the parties' [172] and [174] Supplemental Briefs in Response to the Court's [176] Order on Claim Construction. Upon review of the Briefs and the applicable law, the Court agrees with Plaintiff that it does not have jurisdiction over the unasserted claims in this matter. See Ameranth, Inc. v. Dominos Pizza, LLC, 792 F. App'x 780, 784-85 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (finding no subject matter jurisdiction to determine the validity of claims that were not asserted in the pleadings and did not appear in the plaintiffs infringement contentions). However, it appears to this Court that Defendant is correct that the Court's finding of invalidity of the disputed claim terms renders all of Plaintiff's remaining claims related to the '287 patent as also invalid as indefinite. As such, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 2/3/2025, as to why judgment should not enter in favor of Defendant based on the Court's [176] Amended Order on Claim Construction. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/28/2025. Text Only Entry (cmasec) (Entered: 01/28/2025) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This matter is before the Court on the parties' [172] and [174] Supplemental Briefs in Response to the Court's [176] Order on Claim Construction. Upon review of the Briefs and the applicable law, the Court agrees with Plaintiff that it does not have jurisdiction over the unasserted claims in this matter. See Ameranth, Inc. v. Dominos Pizza, LLC, 792 F. App'x 780, 784-85 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (finding no subject matter jurisdiction to determine the validity of claims that were not asserted in the pleadings and did not appear in the plaintiffs infringement contentions). However, it appears to this Court that Defendant is correct that the Court's finding of invalidity of the disputed claim terms renders all of Plaintiff's remaining claims related to the '287 patent as also invalid as indefinite. As such, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 2/3/2025, as to why judgment should not enter in favor of Defendant based on the Court's [176] Amended Order on Claim Construction. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/28/2025. Text Only Entry (cmasec) (Entered: 01/28/2025)
01/28/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This matter is before the Court on the parties' [172] and [174] Supplemental Briefs in Response to the Court's [176] Order on Claim Construction. Upon review of the Briefs and the applicable law, the Court agrees with Plaintiff that it does not have jurisdiction over the unasserted claims in this matter. See Ameranth, Inc. v. Dominos Pizza, LLC, 792 F. App'x 780, 784-85 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (finding no subject matter jurisdiction to determine the validity of claims that were not asserted in the pleadings and did not appear in the plaintiffs infringement contentions). However, it appears to this Court that Defendant is correct that the Court's finding of invalidity of the disputed claim terms renders all of Plaintiff's remaining claims related to the '287 patent as also invalid as indefinite. As such, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 2/3/2025, as to why judgment should not enter in favor of Defendant based on the Court's [176] Amended Order on Claim Construction. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/28/2025. Text Only Entry (cmasec) (Entered: 01/28/2025) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This matter is before the Court on the parties' [172] and [174] Supplemental Briefs in Response to the Court's [176] Order on Claim Construction. Upon review of the Briefs and the applicable law, the Court agrees with Plaintiff that it does not have jurisdiction over the unasserted claims in this matter. See Ameranth, Inc. v. Dominos Pizza, LLC, 792 F. App'x 780, 784-85 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (finding no subject matter jurisdiction to determine the validity of claims that were not asserted in the pleadings and did not appear in the plaintiffs infringement contentions). However, it appears to this Court that Defendant is correct that the Court's finding of invalidity of the disputed claim terms renders all of Plaintiff's remaining claims related to the '287 patent as also invalid as indefinite. As such, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 2/3/2025, as to why judgment should not enter in favor of Defendant based on the Court's [176] Amended Order on Claim Construction. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/28/2025. Text Only Entry (cmasec) (Entered: 01/28/2025)
01/07/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 1/7/2025. In light of the pending supplemental briefs on summary judgment, the Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference set for January 21, 2025, is VACATED, to be reset if appropriate after the supplemental ruling on summary judgment issues. Text Only Entry (sbplc1) (Entered: 01/07/2025)
01/07/25	Cocona Inc v. VF Outdoor LLC 1:16-CV-02703 ( D. CO )	ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 1/7/2025. In light of the pending supplemental briefs on summary judgment, the Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference set for January 21, 2025, is VACATED, to be reset if appropriate after the supplemental ruling on summary judgment issues. Text Only Entry (sbplc1) (Entered: 01/07/2025)