Viewpointe Archive Services LLC
General
Total Cases7
Active Cases1
Patents4
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
07/12/24 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re 72 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Viewpointe Archive Services LLC, Viewpointe Clearing Settlement & Association Services LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 7/26/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(Anderson, Jeremy) (Entered: 07/12/2024) | |
07/12/24 | MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings - filed by Viewpointe Archive Services LLC, Viewpointe Clearing Settlement & Association Services LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Jeremy) (Entered: 07/12/2024) | |
07/12/24 | UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions - filed by Mirror Imaging LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Phillips, John) Modified on 7/12/2024 (dlw). (Entered: 07/12/2024) | |
07/12/24 | SO ORDERED re 71 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Final Infringement and Final Invalidity Contentions to 7/26/2024 and 8/27/2024, respectively. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/12/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 07/12/2024) | |
06/25/24 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Maryellen Noreika - Motion Hearing re 60 MOTION to Admit Michael D. Schulze as Consulting Expert for Plaintiff held on 6/25/2024. The MOTION to Admit Michael D. Schulze as Consulting Expert for Plaintiff 60 is DENIED. The transcript shall serve as the Court's ruling. (Court Reporter Dale Hawkins.) (as) (Entered: 06/25/2024) | |
06/21/24 | ORAL ORDER RESETTING Hearing on 60 MOTION to Admit Michael D. Schulze as Consulting Expert for Plaintiff - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion Hearing is RESET to begin at 2:00 PM on 6/25/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. All other provisions of the Court's 4/30/2024 Oral Order (D.I. 68) remain. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/21/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 06/21/2024) | |
06/12/24 | SO ORDERED re 69 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Certain Deadlines - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff to serve its Final Infringement Contentions shall be extended to 7/12/2024 and the deadline for Defendant to serve its Final Invalidity Contentions shall be extended to 8/13/2024. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/12/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 06/12/2024) | |
06/11/24 | Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Certain Deadlines - filed by Mirror Imaging LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Phillips, John) Modified on 6/12/2024 (dlw). (Entered: 06/11/2024) | |
04/30/24 | ORAL ORDER Setting IN-PERSON Hearing on 60 MOTION to Admit Michael D. Schulze as Consulting Expert for Plaintiff - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Motion Hearing is set for 6/25/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. The Court is setting aside thirty (30) minutes for the hearing with the time split equally between the parties. Any slide presentations the parties wish to use during the argument shall be emailed (in PDF format) to MN_Civil@ded.uscourts.gov no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing with hard copies delivered to the Clerk's office within one (1) hour thereafter. The parties may, however, agree upon a different time to exchange their respective slides. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/30/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 04/30/2024) | |
04/30/24 | ORAL ORDER re 45 Joint Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2 - In the Joint Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2, Defendant asserts that its motion to dismiss (filed in Texas) "is fully briefed and ripe for consideration." Upon review of the submissions for that motion, it appears that Defendant stated: "Viewpointe requests in the alternative that the Court either dismiss Plaintiff's case for improper venue, transfer the case to the District of Delaware, or dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted." The Texas court chose the second option, transferring the case to the District of Delaware. THEREFORE, Defendant's motion to dismiss has been decided and is not pending before this Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/30/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 04/30/2024) |