Vision Imaging Supplies Inc

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

visionimaginginc.com

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (lc)
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (lc) (Entered: 10/14/2021)
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO VISION IMAGING SUPPLIES, INC. [55] by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendant and its officers and directors, agents etc. are otherwise, shall not make, use, sell, offer to sell, or import into the United States the Accused Products or any products not colorably different therefrom. This Consent Judgment shall finally conclude and dispose of all claims and counterclaims of Plaintiffs against Defendant and Defendant against Plaintiffs with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO VISION IMAGING SUPPLIES, INC. [55] by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendant and its officers and directors, agents etc. are otherwise, shall not make, use, sell, offer to sell, or import into the United States the Accused Products or any products not colorably different therefrom. This Consent Judgment shall finally conclude and dispose of all claims and counterclaims of Plaintiffs against Defendant and Defendant against Plaintiffs with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO VISION IMAGING SUPPLIES, INC. 55 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendant and its officers and directors, agents etc. are otherwise, shall not make, use, sell, offer to sell, or import into the United States the Accused Products or any products not colorably different therefrom. This Consent Judgment shall finally conclude and dispose of all claims and counterclaims of Plaintiffs against Defendant and Defendant against Plaintiffs with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys` fees. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc) (Entered: 10/14/2021) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO VISION IMAGING SUPPLIES, INC. 55 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendant and its officers and directors, agents etc. are otherwise, shall not make, use, sell, offer to sell, or import into the United States the Accused Products or any products not colorably different therefrom. This Consent Judgment shall finally conclude and dispose of all claims and counterclaims of Plaintiffs against Defendant and Defendant against Plaintiffs with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys` fees. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc) (Entered: 10/14/2021)
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Judgment [55] . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Stipulation and consent judgment efiled as one pdf. last page has "it is so order". L.R. 58-10 at least 2 lines of text must accompany the Signature Line for Signature of Judge on a last page of proposed order. The combined format is not applicable to e-filing which requires proposed orders to be separate and submitted as an attachment to the main document, however, no main document "stipulation" was filed, only found in the title as stipulated final proposed consent judgment. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed. (2) Order the document stricken. Or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Judgment [55] . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Stipulation and consent judgment efiled as one pdf. last page has "it is so order". L.R. 58-10 at least 2 lines of text must accompany the Signature Line for Signature of Judge on a last page of proposed order. The combined format is not applicable to e-filing which requires proposed orders to be separate and submitted as an attachment to the main document, however, no main document "stipulation" was filed, only found in the title as stipulated final proposed consent judgment. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed. (2) Order the document stricken. Or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Judgment 55 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Stipulation and consent judgment efiled as one pdf. last page has "it is so order". L.R. 58-10 at least 2 lines of text must accompany the Signature Line for Signature of Judge on a last page of proposed order. The combined format is not applicable to e-filing which requires proposed orders to be separate and submitted as an attachment to the main document, however, no main document "stipulation" was filed, only found in the title as stipulated final proposed consent judgment. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 10/14/2021) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Judgment 55 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Stipulation and consent judgment efiled as one pdf. last page has "it is so order". L.R. 58-10 at least 2 lines of text must accompany the Signature Line for Signature of Judge on a last page of proposed order. The combined format is not applicable to e-filing which requires proposed orders to be separate and submitted as an attachment to the main document, however, no main document "stipulation" was filed, only found in the title as stipulated final proposed consent judgment. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 10/14/2021)
10/14/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 10-14-2021
10/12/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION for Judgment as to Vision Imaging Supplies Inc. filed by Plaintiff Epson America Inc. , Epson Portland Inc. (an Oregon corporation ), Seiko Epson Corporation(a Japan corporation).(Doss, Richard)
10/12/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION for Judgment as to Vision Imaging Supplies, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland Inc.(an Oregon corporation ), Seiko Epson Corporation(a Japan corporation).(Doss, Richard) (Entered: 10/12/2021)
10/07/21	Seiko Epson Corp v. Vision Imaging Supplies Inc 2:21-CV-02756 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendants Bernard Khachi(an individual), Raymond Khachi filed by Plaintiff Seiko Epson Corporation(a Japan corporation), Epson America Inc. , Epson Portland Inc. (an Oregon corporation ).(Doss, Richard)