Vpersonalize Inc

General

Total Cases2
Active Cases--
Patents6
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
03/31/21
MANDATE FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT (2020-1963) as to [205] Notice of Appeal, filed by Magnetize Consultants Ltd, [207] Memorandum/Opinion from USCA. In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered February 4, 2021, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued. Costs are awarded to appellee vPersonalize Inc. in the amount of $45.12 and taxed against the appellant. AFFIRMED (RE)
02/04/21
OPINION FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT (2020-1963) (NOT THE MANDATE) as to [205] Notice of Appeal, filed by Magnetize Consultants Ltd. AFFIRMED. (RE)
07/07/20
FEDERAL CIRCUIT CASE NUMBER 2020-1963 for [205] Notice of Appeal, filed by Magnetize Consultants Ltd. (CDA)
06/15/20
APPEAL NOTIFICATION FORM sent to the Federal Circuit re [205] Notice of Appeal, (CDA)
06/12/20
NOTICE OF APPEAL to Federal Circuit re [202] Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, Order on Motion for Leave to File, by Defendant Magnetize Consultants Ltd. $505, receipt number AWAWDC-6397617 (cc: USCA) (Watkins, Seth)
05/19/20
Costs
05/19/20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part [173] Defendant's Motion for Bill of Costs signed by Deputy in Charge Joe Whiteley.(JW)
05/15/20
JUDGMENT BY COURT. All claims in this matter have been resolved. The Court dismissed Claim II of PlaintiffsFirst Amended Complaint pursuant to the parties' representation that Plaintiff was no longer asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,406,172. Dkt. No. [95] . Claims III and V were dismissed pursuant to the Court's order granting in part and denying in part Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. [152] . Finally, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Claims I and IV. Dkt. No. [155] . (TH)
05/15/20
ORDER denying Defendant's [156] Motion for Attorney Fees. Denying Plaintiff's [197] Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (TH)
04/29/20
RESPONSE, by Defendant Magnetize Consultants Ltd, to [197] MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply to Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Watkins, Seth)