Wang Pengfei

General

Total Cases1
Active Cases1
Patents--
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
11/13/24
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff should review the Court's standing order on "Schedule A" Cases, available at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?IuUaWzNcEoPr4PHl9tvcGaMUezk8AnJ1 under the "Case Procedures" tab. Please note that the table's requirements were revised on October 10, 2024. As explained there, Plaintiff must complete and file the template linked on that page before the Court will consider granting any motion for preliminary injunctive relief. The submission must also provide a listing of all prior Schedule A cases filed in any court in the United States in which Plaintiff was a plaintiff, and a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that Plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Finally, by filing the template, Plaintiff certifies that Plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of a motion for a TRO in this case in any prior proceeding. If the template is not completed by November 27, 2024, the Court may dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 11/13/2024)
11/13/24
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wang Pengfei by Matthew L. De Preter (De Preter, Matthew) (Entered: 11/13/2024)
11/13/24
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (lj, ) (Entered: 11/13/2024)
11/13/24
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached [Consent To][ form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lj, ) (Entered: 11/13/2024)]
11/12/24
MOTION by Plaintiff Wang Pengfei for leave to file Certain Documents Under Seal (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
11/12/24
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wang Pengfei by Sofia Quezada Hastings (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
11/12/24
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
11/12/24
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Wang Pengfei Schedule A to Complaint regarding complaint, [1] (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
11/12/24
COMPLAINT filed by Wang Pengfei; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22718519. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A, # [2] Exhibit B, # [3] Exhibit C, # [4] Exhibit D, # [5] Exhibit E, # [6] Exhibit F, # [7] Exhibit G)(Quezada Hastings, Sofia) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
11/08/24
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis: Plaintiff's motion to seal [6] granted. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining 111 defendants [2] in a single action. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 11/22/24, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. Plaintiff may also want to reference this Court's order in Bug Art Limited v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 7777, Dkt. 28, where the Court expressed its joinder-related concerns in cases of this size. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 11/22/24 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. (ca, ) (Entered: 11/08/2024)