William Araujo
General
Total Cases2
Active Cases1
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10/24/22 | JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between Plaintiff William Araujo and Defendants E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. and Forgot My Souvenirs LLC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), that all claims against Defendants in the above-styled action shall be dismissed with prejudice. It is further stipulated that all counterclaims by Defendants against William Araujo in the above-styled action shall be dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and expenses. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 10/24/2022) (jca) (Entered: 10/24/2022) | |
| 10/24/22 | ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney John Zaccaria. RE-FILE Document No. 99 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the individual party/parties whom the voluntary dismissal is against was/were not selected; (2) the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by all parties who have appeared. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct individual filer/filers - select the correct individual party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 10/24/2022) | |
| 10/21/22 | FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Zaccaria, John) Modified on 10/24/2022 (tp). (Entered: 10/21/2022) | |
| 10/20/22 | ORDER denying 95 Motion to Seal. As such, Plaintiff's motion to seal the Court's Claim Construction Opinion and Order is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Docket Number 95. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 10/20/2022) (tg) (Entered: 10/20/2022) | |
| 09/30/22 | FIRST BRIEF re: 96 Order on Motion to Seal, . Document filed by William Araujo..(Haidri, Amirali) (Entered: 09/30/2022) | |
| 09/21/22 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT with respect to 95 FIRST MOTION to Seal the Claim Construction Opinion. ENDORSEMENT: The Court finds that additional briefing on Plaintiff's request to seal Dtk. 93 would be beneficial. Plaintiff shall submit a brief in support of his request to seal Dkt. 93 by September 30, 2022. Plaintiff's brief should address why sealing is appropriate pursuant to the three-step inquiry laid out in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 9/21/2022) (jca) (Entered: 09/21/2022) | |
| 09/21/22 | Set/Reset Deadlines: Brief due by 9/30/2022. (jca) (Entered: 09/21/2022) |