Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc

General

Total Cases16

Active Cases--

Patents8

CourtsE.D. Texas C.D. California N.D. Illinois

TypeNPE

Elite Ratings

PTAB

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L4

E

PTAB

L5

B

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/07/25	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # [1] ORDER) (aco) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/07/25	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Judge George H Wu. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Joint Stipulation of the parties, the claims brought by Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. on the one hand, and TCT Mobile, Inc. and TCT Mobile (US) Inc, on the other hand, shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case [289] . (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco) (Entered: 02/07/2025) ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Judge George H Wu. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Joint Stipulation of the parties, the claims brought by Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. on the one hand, and TCT Mobile, Inc. and TCT Mobile (US) Inc, on the other hand, shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case [289] . (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/07/25	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Nelson, Edward) (Entered: 02/07/2025)
02/04/25	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE STATUS HEARING by Judge George H Wu. [287] Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall have until noon on Monday, February 10, 2025 to dismiss this case with prejudice or file joint status report. [See Order for further details.] (san) (Entered: 02/04/2025) ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE STATUS HEARING by Judge George H Wu. [287] Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall have until noon on Monday, February 10, 2025 to dismiss this case with prejudice or file joint status report. [See Order for further details.] (san) (Entered: 02/04/2025)
02/03/25	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT (Joint) And Stipulation to Continue the Status Hearing filed by Defendants TCT Mobile US Inc., TCT Mobile, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Cangro, Bradford) (Entered: 02/03/2025)
08/19/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER REGADING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Stay Case [283] : Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No. 8:23-cv-01476- GW-RAOx are stayed pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiff's receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2024, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case, including the Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, are vacated. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024) ORDER REGADING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Stay Case [283] : Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No. 8:23-cv-01476- GW-RAOx are stayed pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiff's receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2024, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case, including the Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, are vacated. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024)
08/19/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] held before Judge George H Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Court approves the stipulation to stay the case. Separate order to issue. A status conference is set for February 6, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a stipulation to dismiss, or a joint status report by noon on February 3, 2025. All previously set deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024) MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] held before Judge George H Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Court approves the stipulation to stay the case. Separate order to issue. A status conference is set for February 6, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a stipulation to dismiss, or a joint status report by noon on February 3, 2025. All previously set deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024)
08/16/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H Wu: The Court sets a hearing on HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] for August 19, 2024 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H Wu. Counsel may appear telephonically by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. The Court recommends counsel use a landline without the use of the speakerphone when appearing by telephone due to sound reception. If a cellular phone is used and it causes interference or interruptions, the Court will stop the proceeding and require counsel to appear in person. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/16/2024) TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H Wu: The Court sets a hearing on HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] for August 19, 2024 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H Wu. Counsel may appear telephonically by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. The Court recommends counsel use a landline without the use of the speakerphone when appearing by telephone due to sound reception. If a cellular phone is used and it causes interference or interruptions, the Court will stop the proceeding and require counsel to appear in person. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/16/2024)
08/16/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending settlement filed by Plaintiff Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Nelson, Edward) (Entered: 08/16/2024)
08/16/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF VIDEO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE held before Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Counsel of record for the parties appeared by Zoom for a settlement conference. Also present by Zoom were: Nicholas Wilson, client representative for Plaintiff; Lawrence Wu and Linda Zhang, client representatives for Defendant, and Ude Lu and Louise Lu, counsel for Defendant who are not attorneys of record in the instant litigation. At the beginning of the proceedings, the parties informed the Court that they had reached a settlement and would jointly inform the District Judge. Counsel for Plaintiff: Edward Nelson. Counsel for Defendant: Bradford Cangro. Time in settlement conference: 10 minutes. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY). (RAO) (Entered: 08/16/2024) MINUTES OF VIDEO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE held before Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Counsel of record for the parties appeared by Zoom for a settlement conference. Also present by Zoom were: Nicholas Wilson, client representative for Plaintiff; Lawrence Wu and Linda Zhang, client representatives for Defendant, and Ude Lu and Louise Lu, counsel for Defendant who are not attorneys of record in the instant litigation. At the beginning of the proceedings, the parties informed the Court that they had reached a settlement and would jointly inform the District Judge. Counsel for Plaintiff: Edward Nelson. Counsel for Defendant: Bradford Cangro. Time in settlement conference: 10 minutes. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY). (RAO) (Entered: 08/16/2024)