Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd

General

Total Cases6

Active Cases3

Patents49

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

zhejiang-zhengte

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L2

D

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/10/25	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Sojag Inc 2:24-CV-06020 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sojag Inc. answer now due 3/14/2025, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) [1] filed by Defendant Sojag Inc..(Attorney Derrick F Coleman added to party Sojag Inc.(pty:dft))(Coleman, Derrick) (Entered: 02/10/2025)
01/31/25	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Sojag Inc 2:24-CV-06020 ( C.D. CA )	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd., upon Defendant Sojag Inc. served on 1/22/2025, answer due 2/12/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mr. Sebastien Victoria, Distribution Center Manager in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified (Attachments: # [1] Original Untranslated Proof of Service)(Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 01/31/2025) PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd., upon Defendant Sojag Inc. served on 1/22/2025, answer due 2/12/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mr. Sebastien Victoria, Distribution Center Manager in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified (Attachments: # [1] Original Untranslated Proof of Service)(Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
01/24/25	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Sojag Inc 2:24-CV-06020 ( C.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT re: Service of Summons and Complaint filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A)(Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 01/24/2025)
01/17/25	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Sojag Inc 2:24-CV-06020 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO SOJAG INC. (DKT. [14] ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Response by Plaintiff to OSC Regarding Continued Order to Show Cause (Dkt. [17] ), good cause has been shown as to the request for additional time to serve Defendant, Sojag Inc. Accordingly, the OSC Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution as to Sojag Inc. (Dkt. [14] ) is discharged. On or before January 24, 2025, Plaintiff shall submit a status report as to any update from the Quebec Central Authority as to timing of the service of Defendant, Sojag Inc. Based on a review of the status report, a determination will be made as to the deadline for the service of process to be completed. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mhk) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/17/2025) (IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO SOJAG INC. (DKT. [14] ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Response by Plaintiff to OSC Regarding Continued Order to Show Cause (Dkt. [17] ), good cause has been shown as to the request for additional time to serve Defendant, Sojag Inc. Accordingly, the OSC Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution as to Sojag Inc. (Dkt. [14] ) is discharged. On or before January 24, 2025, Plaintiff shall submit a status report as to any update from the Quebec Central Authority as to timing of the service of Defendant, Sojag Inc. Based on a review of the status report, a determination will be made as to the deadline for the service of process to be completed. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mhk) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/17/2025)
12/30/24	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Sojag Inc 2:24-CV-06020 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.to Text Only Scheduling Notice, 16 (Foss, Taylor) (Entered: 12/30/2024)
12/17/24	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co Ltd 2:24-CV-09277 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 8-3) [24] by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Accordingly, the Stipulation is APPROVED, as follows. The deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to January 9, 2025. (rolm) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/17/24	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co Ltd 2:24-CV-09277 ( C.D. CA )	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Arthur J Bobel counsel for Defendants Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co., Ltd., Aukey Group Holding Limited. Adding Arthur J. Bobel as counsel of record for Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co., Ltd. and Aukey Group Holding Limited for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co., Ltd. and Aukey Group Holding Limited. (Bobel, Arthur) (Entered: 12/17/2024) Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Arthur J Bobel counsel for Defendants Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co., Ltd., Aukey Group Holding Limited. Adding Arthur J. Bobel as counsel of record for Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co., Ltd. and Aukey Group Holding Limited for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co., Ltd. and Aukey Group Holding Limited. (Bobel, Arthur) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/17/24	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co Ltd 2:24-CV-09277 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Notice of Appearance, (Dkt. [20] ). The document is stricken. Document must be filed in five days using the correct docket entry. (dto) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/13/24	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co Ltd 2:24-CV-09277 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance, [20] . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G-123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) (Entered: 12/13/2024) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance, [20] . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G-123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) (Entered: 12/13/2024)
12/13/24	Zhejiang Zhengte Co Ltd v. Shenzhen Lanbiaoyi Technology Co Ltd 2:24-CV-09277 ( C.D. CA )	STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (dto) (Entered: 12/13/2024) STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (dto) (Entered: 12/13/2024)