Zyppah Inc

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
04/28/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, AND FOR THE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE PAYMENT PROVISIONS OF SETTLEMENT (DKT. 35) [61] by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (lom) (Entered: 04/28/2021)
04/22/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Stipulated Settlement filed by Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC, Ryan Shapiro. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation)(Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/19/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING A TEN-DAY EXTENSION OF THE SETTLEMENT PERIOD (DKT. [59] ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Therefore, the Stipulation is APPROVED, and the time to reopen the action is extended through and including April 28, 2021. (lom) (Entered: 04/19/2021)
04/14/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION for Settlement JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING A TEN-DAY EXTENSION OF THE SETTLEMENT PERIOD filed by Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 04/14/2021)
03/15/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE) (Dkt. 57 ); JS-6 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of the parties Joint Report re Settlement, the Court orders that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 30 days from the date of this Order; provided, however, any request by any party(ies) that the Court do so, shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 30-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party(ies) making such a request reasonably expect the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41, which does not require the approval of the Court. Such a stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 30-day period, or by such later date ordered by the Court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 03/15/2021) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE) (Dkt. 57 ); JS-6 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of the parties Joint Report re Settlement, the Court orders that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 30 days from the date of this Order; provided, however, any request by any party(ies) that the Court do so, shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 30-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party(ies) making such a request reasonably expect the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41, which does not require the approval of the Court. Such a stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 30-day period, or by such later date ordered by the Court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 03/15/2021)
03/11/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT JOINT REPORT RE SETTLEMENT filed by Counter Defendants Brandable Ventures, LLC, Ryan Shapiro, Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC. (Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 03/11/2021)
02/16/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT filed by Counter Defendant Brandable Ventures, LLC, Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC. (Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 02/16/2021)
02/05/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	SUPPLEMENT to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue 22 filed by Defendants Always More Marketing, Inc., Jonathan Greenburg, Laura Greenburg, Zyppah, Inc., Counter Claimants Always More Marketing, Inc., Jonathan Greenburg, Laura Greenburg, Zyppah, Inc.. (Katz, Michael) (Entered: 02/05/2021)
02/03/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER JOINT REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On or before February 17, 2021, after meeting and conferring in good faith, the parties shall file an updated joint report as to identifying any open issues regarding the '341 patent as well as a schedule for resolving them. The experienced counsel who are representing the parties are encouraged to work collaboratively and professionally in this process to facilitate party and judicial efficiency. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/03/2021) (IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER JOINT REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On or before February 17, 2021, after meeting and conferring in good faith, the parties shall file an updated joint report as to identifying any open issues regarding the '341 patent as well as a schedule for resolving them. The experienced counsel who are representing the parties are encouraged to work collaboratively and professionally in this process to facilitate party and judicial efficiency. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/03/2021)
02/03/21	Brandable Ventures LLC v. Zyppah Inc 2:20-CV-08427 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER JOINT REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On or before February 17, 2021, after meeting and conferring in good faith, the parties shall file an updated joint report as to identifying any open issues regarding the '341 patent as well as a schedule for resolving them. The experienced counsel who are representing the parties are encouraged to work collaboratively and professionally in this process to facilitate party and judicial efficiency. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/03/2021) (IN CHAMBERS) TEXT-ONLY ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER JOINT REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On or before February 17, 2021, after meeting and conferring in good faith, the parties shall file an updated joint report as to identifying any open issues regarding the '341 patent as well as a schedule for resolving them. The experienced counsel who are representing the parties are encouraged to work collaboratively and professionally in this process to facilitate party and judicial efficiency. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/03/2021)