DCT

2:19-cv-06574

Regents Of University Of California v. Bed Bath Beyond Inc

Log In
Key Events
Complaint

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:19-cv-06574, C.D. Cal., 07/30/2019
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper because Defendant has engaged in infringement in the district and has numerous regular and established retail store locations there, citing a specific infringing sale at a store in Burbank, California.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s filament-style LED light bulbs infringe four patents related to foundational LED efficiency and design technologies developed at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
  • Technical Context: Filament LED technology is designed to provide the energy efficiency and longevity of solid-state lighting while mimicking the aesthetic appearance of traditional incandescent light bulbs.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint does not mention any prior litigation, inter partes review proceedings, or licensing history between the parties.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2006-11-15 Priority Date ('789, '529, '464 Patents)
2006-12-11 Priority Date ('916 Patent)
2010-08-24 '789 Patent Issued
~2014-01-01 Filament LED light bulbs become widely available in U.S.
2016-01-19 '529 Patent Issued
2018-01-02 '464 Patent Issued
2019-02-26 '916 Patent Issued
2019-06-04 Alleged infringing sale at Defendant's Burbank, CA store
2019-07-30 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 7,781,789 - "Transparent Mirrorless Light Emitting Diode," issued August 24, 2010

  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: The patent describes a problem in conventional Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) where light emitted toward the back of the device is reflected by a mirror. This reflected light can then be re-absorbed by the light-emitting "active layer," which reduces the device's overall efficiency and light output (’789 Patent, col. 4:48-60).
    • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a "transparent mirrorless" LED structure where, with the exception of the active layer, all component layers are transparent to the wavelength of light being emitted. This design allows light to be extracted from multiple surfaces of the LED, including the front and back sides, thereby minimizing internal reflections and the associated re-absorption losses (’789 Patent, Abstract; col. 5:29-36). Figure 4A illustrates this concept, showing light (424) escaping from both the top surface (428) and the bottom surface (426) of the LED structure.
    • Technical Importance: This approach sought to increase the fundamental light extraction efficiency of LED packages, a key metric for the general lighting industry, by reducing a primary source of internal energy loss (Compl. ¶¶ 12, 14).
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint alleges infringement of "at least one claim" of the ’789 Patent but does not specify which claims are asserted (Compl. ¶44). The referenced claim chart exhibit is not provided.

U.S. Patent No. 9,240,529 - "Textured Phosphor Conversion Layer Light Emitting Diode," issued January 19, 2016

  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: White LEDs often use a phosphor layer to convert blue light from an LED chip into yellow or other colors, with the combined light appearing white. The patent notes that in conventional designs with a smooth phosphor layer, light can be internally reflected at the interface between the phosphor and the surrounding material (e.g., air or epoxy), sending it back toward the chip where it can be absorbed and lost, reducing efficiency (’529 Patent, col. 5:15-26).
    • The Patented Solution: The invention discloses texturing or roughening the surface of the phosphor layer. This non-planar surface disrupts internal reflection and increases the probability that light will escape the device, thereby improving the overall luminous efficacy (’529 Patent, Abstract). Figure 1 of the patent depicts a phosphor layer (108) with a textured, pyramid-like surface designed to enhance light extraction (110).
    • Technical Importance: By improving light extraction from the phosphor component itself, this technology aimed to increase the efficiency of producing white light, which is critical for LEDs intended for general illumination (Compl. ¶34).
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint alleges infringement of "at least one claim" of the ’529 Patent but does not specify which claims are asserted (Compl. ¶48). The referenced claim chart exhibit is not provided.

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,859,464 - "Light Emitting Diode With Light Extracted From Front And Back Sides Of A Lead Frame," issued January 2, 2018

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes an LED assembly where the LED chip is mounted on a transparent plate integrated into the lead frame (the metal frame that provides mechanical support and electrical connections) (’464 Patent, Abstract). This configuration is designed to allow light to be extracted from both the front and back sides of the LED chip, increasing the total light output from the device (Compl. ¶38).
  • Asserted Claims: The complaint asserts infringement of "at least one claim" (Compl. ¶52).
  • Accused Features: The filament LED light bulbs, which inherently emit light in multiple directions, are accused of infringing this patent (Compl. ¶40, 53).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 10,217,916 - "Transparent Light Emitting Diodes," issued February 26, 2019

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent, a continuation of the family that includes the ’789 patent, describes a transparent LED structure comprising multiple III-nitride layers. The key inventive concept is that all layers, apart from the active light-emitting region, are transparent to the emitted light, allowing for effective light extraction in multiple directions (’916 Patent, Abstract). The invention also contemplates that one or more surfaces of the III-nitride layers can be roughened or textured to further enhance light extraction (Compl. ¶39).
  • Asserted Claims: The complaint asserts infringement of "at least one claim" (Compl. ¶56).
  • Accused Features: The fundamental transparent structure of the filament LED components is accused of infringing this patent (Compl. ¶40, 57).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

  • Product Identification: The accused products are "filament LED light bulbs," including specific models sold under the "Luminance Nostalgia" and "Feit Electric" brands (Compl. ¶40).
  • Functionality and Market Context: The accused products are designed to replicate the aesthetic of "Edison" or "vintage" style incandescent bulbs by using one or more LED-based filaments that glow visibly inside a clear glass bulb (Compl. ¶11, 26). An image in the complaint illustrates a representative accused product and a close-up of its filament LED component (Compl. p. 2). The products are marketed to consumers as replacements for traditional bulbs that offer significant energy savings and longer lifespans (Compl. ¶12-13). An image of the packaging for an accused product touts "91% energy savings" compared to a traditional 60-watt incandescent bulb (Compl. p. 5). The complaint alleges a substantial and growing market for these products, with sales expected to exceed $1 billion in 2019 (Compl. ¶15).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that it has attached claim charts as Exhibits F, G, H, and I demonstrating infringement of each of the four asserted patents, respectively (Compl. ¶¶ 45, 49, 53, 57). However, these exhibits were not provided with the complaint. The infringement theory for each patent is therefore summarized in prose based on the complaint's narrative allegations.

U.S. Patent No. 7,781,789 Infringement Allegations

The complaint's narrative suggests the accused filament LEDs infringe by embodying the "transparent mirrorless" design claimed in the ’789 Patent. The theory appears to be that the fundamental structure of the LED filaments allows light to be emitted efficiently from multiple surfaces without relying on the reflective mirrors that characterize older, less efficient LED designs, thereby reducing re-absorption losses (Compl. ¶¶ 35-36, 45).

U.S. Patent No. 9,240,529 Infringement Allegations

The infringement theory regarding the ’529 Patent appears to focus on the phosphor coating used on the accused LED filaments to convert the native blue light into a warmer white light suitable for general illumination. The complaint alleges that the accused products infringe claims directed to using a textured phosphor conversion layer, which improves the efficiency of light extraction from the phosphor material itself (Compl. ¶¶ 37, 49).

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A potential point of contention for all asserted patents may be whether the claimed structures, which are described in the context of discrete, typically planar LED chips, can be construed to cover the elongated, linear "filament" structures used in the accused bulbs. The complaint acknowledges that filament configurations can vary in shape, number, and length (Compl. ¶8), which may raise questions about the applicability of claim limitations drafted for conventional LED packages.
    • Technical Questions: Regarding the ’529 Patent, a key factual question will likely be what evidence Plaintiff can produce to show that the phosphor coatings on the accused filaments are "textured" in the manner required by the asserted claims. The complaint states that Plaintiff has "analyzed samples" of the bulbs but provides no specific data or microscopic evidence to support the allegation of a textured surface (Compl. ¶9).

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

The complaint does not identify the specific claims asserted against the accused products, instead referencing unprovided claim chart exhibits. Without the asserted claim language, an analysis of key terms for construction is not possible.

VI. Other Allegations

The complaint does not contain allegations of indirect or willful infringement.

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

This case appears to present two central questions for the court's determination:

  • A core issue will be one of technological applicability: can the claims of the asserted patents, which were developed for and described in the context of traditional discrete LED chip architectures, be construed to read on the distinct, elongated "filament" structures that characterize the accused vintage-style bulbs?
  • A key evidentiary question will be one of functional proof: what technical evidence will the Plaintiff produce from its analysis of the accused products to demonstrate that they actually practice the specific structural and material limitations of the asserted claims, such as a "transparent mirrorless" design or, more pointedly, a physically "textured" phosphor layer?