ITC

337-TA-828

Mondis Technology Ltd v. Innolux Corp

Log In
General
Filed01/13/12
StatusTerminated
Investigation Phases
VIO
ITC
337-TA-828
Category BasketLCD/TV
HTS Number & Description
8517.12.00 - Telephones for cellular networks or for other wireless networks
8517.18.00 - Telephone sets, nesoi
8528.72.28 - Non-high definition color television reception app., nonprojection, w/CRT, video display diag. ov 35.56 cm, incorporating a VCR or player
8528.72.32 - Non-high definition color television reception apparatus, nonprojection, w/CRT, video display diag. ov 35.56 cm, not incorp. a VCR or player
8528.72.62 - Color television reception apparatus w/flat panel screen, video display diagonal n/ov 34.29 cm, incorporating a VCR or player
8528.72.68 - Color television reception apparatus w/flat panel screen, video display diagonal n/o 34.29 cm, not incorporating a VCR or player
8528.72.72 - Color television reception apparatus w/flat panel screen, video display diagonal over 34.29 cm, not incorporating a VCR or player
8542.32.00 - Electronic integrated circuits: memories
8542.60.00 - Electronic hybrid integrated circuits
Administrative Law Judges
Judge
Cases
Inst. Rate
Violation Rate
Theodore Essex------
Attorney Advisor--
Complainant
Party
Name
Ratings
Mondis Technology Ltd NPE
--
--
--
No Parties
Attorney
Name
Ratings
Foster Murphy Altman & Nickel
--
--
--
James B. Altman
--
--
--
Barbara A. Murphy
--
--
--
David F. Nickel
--
--
--
Susan Koegel
--
--
--
Daniel B. Epstein
--
--
--
No Attorneys
Respondent
Party
Name
Ratings
Innolux Corp 
--
--
--
Chimei Innolux Corp 
--
--
--
No Parties
Attorney
Name
Ratings
Cooley LLP
--
--
--
Thomas J. Friel, Jr.
--
--
--
James P. Brogan
--
--
--
Stephen R. Smith
--
--
--
No Attorneys