PTAB

IPR2022-00682

Eden Park Illumination Inc v. Neister S Edward

General

Filed

03/25/22

Institution10/27/22

FWD10/24/23

Close10/24/23

StatusFinal Written Decision

OutcomeUnpatentable

USPTOIPR2022-00682

Appeals

Administrative Patent Judges

Judge	Cases	Inst. Rate	FWD Inv. Rate
Avelyn M Ross	200+	65%	86%
Elizabeth M Roesel	300+	58%	79%
Jeffrey W Abraham	400+	55%	80%
Julia Heaney	100+	77%	64%

Petitioner

Party

Name	Ratings
Eden Park Illumination Inc	L1 C
Far UV Technologies Inc	L1 C
Larson Electronics LLC	L1 C

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Fish & Richardson	L5 A
David B. Conrad	L2 B

No Attorneys

Respondent

Party

Name	Ratings
S Edward Neister	L1 D

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
King & Spalding LLP	L4 B
Brent P. Ray	L3 E
Abby Parsons	-- -- --

No Attorneys