Weide & Miller LTD

Nevada

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases54

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufCommunicationsSoftware, Security

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/25/24	Signify North America Corp v. Lepro Innovation Inc 2:22-CV-02095 ( D. NV )	MOTION to Seal Document by Defendants Home Ever Inc., Innovation Rules Inc., LE Innovation Inc., Lepro Innovation Inc., Letianlighting, Inc.. Responses due by 11/8/2024. (Brown, Nicholas) (Entered: 10/25/2024)
10/25/24	Signify North America Corp v. Lepro Innovation Inc 2:22-CV-02095 ( D. NV )	MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF INFRINGEMENT AND DEFENDANTS INVALDITY DEFENSES re [158] Notice of Manual Filing, by Plaintiffs Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/15/2024. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1, # [2] Exhibit 2, # [3] Exhibit 3, # [4] Exhibit 4, # [5] Exhibit 5, # [6] Exhibit 6, # [7] Exhibit 7, # [8] Exhibit 8, # [9] Exhibit 9, # [10] Exhibit 10, # [11] Exhibit 11, # [12] Exhibit 12, # [13] Exhibit 13, # [14] Exhibit 14, # [15] Exhibit 15, # [16] Exhibit 16, # [17] Exhibit 17, # [18] Exhibit 18, # [19] Exhibit 19, # [20] Exhibit 20, # [21] Exhibit 21, # [22] Exhibit 22)(Austin, F.) (Entered: 10/25/2024) MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF INFRINGEMENT AND DEFENDANTS INVALDITY DEFENSES re [158] Notice of Manual Filing, by Plaintiffs Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/15/2024. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1, # [2] Exhibit 2, # [3] Exhibit 3, # [4] Exhibit 4, # [5] Exhibit 5, # [6] Exhibit 6, # [7] Exhibit 7, # [8] Exhibit 8, # [9] Exhibit 9, # [10] Exhibit 10, # [11] Exhibit 11, # [12] Exhibit 12, # [13] Exhibit 13, # [14] Exhibit 14, # [15] Exhibit 15, # [16] Exhibit 16, # [17] Exhibit 17, # [18] Exhibit 18, # [19] Exhibit 19, # [20] Exhibit 20, # [21] Exhibit 21, # [22] Exhibit 22)(Austin, F.) (Entered: 10/25/2024)
10/25/24	Signify North America Corp v. Lepro Innovation Inc 2:22-CV-02095 ( D. NV )	NOTICE of Manual Filing by Plaintiffs Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Object: Flash Drive, Volume(s): 3MB, Description: USB Flash Drive containing a 3MB video of Plaintiffs demonstrator bulb, manually filed with the Clerk's Office. (Austin, F.) (Entered: 10/25/2024)
10/23/24	Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Geotab USA Inc 2:24-CV-01934 ( D. NV )	Civil Case Terminated. Case opened in error by counsel. (JQC) (Entered: 10/23/2024)
09/11/24	Facetec Inc v. Iproov Ltd 2:21-CV-02252 ( D. NV )	ORDER Granting [121] Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) to Extend Briefing Schedule re [117] Motion to Compel. Reply brief due by 9/20/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 9/11/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ) (Entered: 09/11/2024)
07/16/24	Hydrafacial LLC v. Medicreations LLC 2:24-CV-00855 ( D. NV )	MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/16/2024. Pending before the Court is the 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Medicreations, LLC, and the 19 Motion/Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice filed by Steven Tepera. For good cause appearing, the 19 Motion/Verified Petition is GRANTED. After Defendant filed the 16 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff Hydrafacial, LLC filed its 20 Amended Complaint. Because Plaintiff's 20 Amended Complaint supersedes the original 1 Complaint, Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. See Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLC, 889 F.3d 517, 531 (9th Cir. 2018). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JD) (Entered: 07/16/2024) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/16/2024. Pending before the Court is the 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Medicreations, LLC, and the 19 Motion/Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice filed by Steven Tepera. For good cause appearing, the 19 Motion/Verified Petition is GRANTED. After Defendant filed the 16 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff Hydrafacial, LLC filed its 20 Amended Complaint. Because Plaintiff's 20 Amended Complaint supersedes the original 1 Complaint, Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. See Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLC, 889 F.3d 517, 531 (9th Cir. 2018). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JD) (Entered: 07/16/2024)
06/18/24	Fohse Inc v. Esttech Inc 2:22-CV-00618 ( D. NV )	ORDER denying 55 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDER denying 58 Motion to Strike as moot. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/17/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) (Entered: 06/18/2024)
06/13/24	I4f Licensing NV v. Kolay Flooring Intl LLC 2:24-CV-00242 ( D. NV )	AO 120 - REPORT on the determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (HAM) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
02/28/24	Peritas Brands LLC v. Leaphigh Animals LLC 2:23-CV-00483 ( D. NV )	MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/28/2024. Re: 62 Motion to Stay Discovery and 84 Motion to Extend Time. The Honorable District Judge Gloria M. Navarro has issued a ruling on Defendant's second and third motions to dismiss, ordered additional briefing on Defendant's first motion to dismiss, and ordered the parties to file an amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement. (ECF No. 86 ). Given this order's impact on the pending motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 62 ) and motion to extend time (ECF No. 84 ), the Court denies both motions as outlined below. Defendant's pending motion to stay (ECF No. 62 ) seeks a discovery stay pending a ruling on all three of Defendant's motions to dismiss. However, Judge Navarro has now ruled on two of those motions and ordered additional briefing on the other. The Court thus DENIES the motion to stay without prejudice and VACATES the hearing set for March 12, 2024 at 10:00 AM. Defendant's pending motion to extend time seeks additional time to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief. (ECF No. 84 ). However, now that the parties will be filing an amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, the Court denies Defendant's motion to extend as MOOT. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) (Entered: 02/28/2024) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/28/2024. Re: 62 Motion to Stay Discovery and 84 Motion to Extend Time. The Honorable District Judge Gloria M. Navarro has issued a ruling on Defendant's second and third motions to dismiss, ordered additional briefing on Defendant's first motion to dismiss, and ordered the parties to file an amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement. (ECF No. 86 ). Given this order's impact on the pending motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 62 ) and motion to extend time (ECF No. 84 ), the Court denies both motions as outlined below. Defendant's pending motion to stay (ECF No. 62 ) seeks a discovery stay pending a ruling on all three of Defendant's motions to dismiss. However, Judge Navarro has now ruled on two of those motions and ordered additional briefing on the other. The Court thus DENIES the motion to stay without prejudice and VACATES the hearing set for March 12, 2024 at 10:00 AM. Defendant's pending motion to extend time seeks additional time to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief. (ECF No. 84 ). However, now that the parties will be filing an amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, the Court denies Defendant's motion to extend as MOOT. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) (Entered: 02/28/2024)
09/06/23	Hawk Technology Systems LLC v. Castle Retail LLC 2:20-CV-02766 ( W.D. TN )	Sealed Document Weide & Miller's Response to Show Cause Order. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Richard M. Carter, # 2 Exhibit A (to Declaration) - In re Butcher Shop of Cordova, LLC, # 3 Exhibit B (to Declaration) - West Stone Works v. Wilson's Funeral Home, # 4 Exhibit C (to Declaration) - In re Lake District, LLC, # 5 Exhibit D (to Declaration) - In re CAH Acquisition Company 11, LLC, # 6 Exhibit E (to Declaration) - One Two Three, LLC v. Jerry L. Trentham, # 7 Exhibit F (to Declaration) - Clio, # 8 Exhibit E (to Declaration) - Legal.io)(Carter, Richard) (Entered: 09/06/2023) Sealed Document Weide & Miller's Response to Show Cause Order. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Richard M. Carter, # 2 Exhibit A (to Declaration) - In re Butcher Shop of Cordova, LLC, # 3 Exhibit B (to Declaration) - West Stone Works v. Wilson's Funeral Home, # 4 Exhibit C (to Declaration) - In re Lake District, LLC, # 5 Exhibit D (to Declaration) - In re CAH Acquisition Company 11, LLC, # 6 Exhibit E (to Declaration) - One Two Three, LLC v. Jerry L. Trentham, # 7 Exhibit F (to Declaration) - Clio, # 8 Exhibit E (to Declaration) - Legal.io)(Carter, Richard) (Entered: 09/06/2023)