Ruttenberg IP Law

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases32

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Semicond., OpticCommunicationsTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/03/24	Meridian Rapid Defense Group LLC v. Delta Scientific Corp 2:23-CV-07222 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 115 filed by Counter Defendant Meridian Rapid Defense Group LLC, Plaintiff Meridian Rapid Defense Group LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 6, # 2 Exhibit 7, # 3 Exhibit 8)(Ruttenberg, Guy) (Entered: 09/03/2024)
08/08/24	DMF Inc v. AMP Plus Inc 2:18-CV-07090 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND JOINT REPORT 833 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court, having considered the stipulation of Plaintiff ("DMF") and Defendants AMP Plus Inc. dba ELCO Lighting and ELCO Lighting, Inc. ("ELCO"), and good cause having been shown, orders as follows: 1. ELCO shall file its Objections to DMF's Proposed Judgment required by the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. 831) by no later than August 20, 2024. 2. The parties shall file the Joint Report required by the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. 831) by no later than August 20, 2024. (rolm) (Entered: 08/08/2024) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND JOINT REPORT 833 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court, having considered the stipulation of Plaintiff ("DMF") and Defendants AMP Plus Inc. dba ELCO Lighting and ELCO Lighting, Inc. ("ELCO"), and good cause having been shown, orders as follows: 1. ELCO shall file its Objections to DMF's Proposed Judgment required by the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. 831) by no later than August 20, 2024. 2. The parties shall file the Joint Report required by the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. 831) by no later than August 20, 2024. (rolm) (Entered: 08/08/2024)
08/07/24	DMF Inc v. AMP Plus Inc 2:18-CV-07090 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Objections and and Joint Report filed by Defendants AMP Plus, Inc.(a California corporation), ELCO Lighting Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ruttenberg, Guy) (Entered: 08/07/2024)
07/17/24	Seoul Viosys Co Ltd v. Feit Electric Co Inc 2:24-CV-04238 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Simeon G. Papacostas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant FEIT Electric Co., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37845688) 30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): GSC from NY missing. (lt) (Entered: 07/17/2024) NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Simeon G. Papacostas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant FEIT Electric Co., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37845688) 30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): GSC from NY missing. (lt) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
07/17/24	Seoul Viosys Co Ltd v. Feit Electric Co Inc 2:24-CV-04238 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: GRANTING 31 Non-Resident Attorney Kalpesh K. Shah APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Feit Electriic Company, Inc., designating Douglas Hahn as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lt) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
07/17/24	Seoul Viosys Co Ltd v. Feit Electric Co Inc 2:24-CV-04238 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: GRANTING 29 Non-Resident Attorney Cristina Q. Almendarez APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Feit Electriic Company, Inc., designating Douglas Hahn as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lt) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
07/17/24	Seoul Viosys Co Ltd v. Feit Electric Co Inc 2:24-CV-04238 ( C.D. CA )	Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FEIT Electric Co., Inc., identifying none other than parties to the case. (Hahn, Douglas) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
07/17/24	Seoul Viosys Co Ltd v. Feit Electric Co Inc 2:24-CV-04238 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT 27 by defendant Feit Electric Co., Inc. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. CLARIFICATION OF THE ABOVE: Page 1 is ONLY a list of defendants' attorneys and title of the Court. The Case Caption and case number and title of document Erroneously on page 2. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 07/17/2024) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT 27 by defendant Feit Electric Co., Inc. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. CLARIFICATION OF THE ABOVE: Page 1 is ONLY a list of defendants' attorneys and title of the Court. The Case Caption and case number and title of document Erroneously on page 2. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
07/17/24	Seoul Viosys Co Ltd v. Feit Electric Co Inc 2:24-CV-04238 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE:FEIT Electric Co., Inc.'s Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 28 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 07/17/2024) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE:FEIT Electric Co., Inc.'s Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 28 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
06/04/24	Document Security Systems Inc v. Seoul Semiconductor Co Ltd 8:19-CV-01792 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (es) (Entered: 06/04/2024)