Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases23

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

barackferrazzano

bfkn.com

Practice Areas

Semicond., OpticCommunicationsComp. Arch. and Software

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/24/24	Visionx Technologies LLC v. Omnivision Technologies Inc 8:23-CV-02068 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Parties have entered a Confidential Release Agreement to Resolve the Civil Action filed by Defendant OmniVision Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1 - Final Judgment)(Bali, Salil) (Entered: 10/24/2024)
08/08/23	Ice Rover Inc v. Yeti Holdings Inc 6:22-CV-00801 ( W.D. TX )	ORDER GRANTING 50 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Joseph P. McCollum. Attorney added for Yeti Coolers, LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (bot2) (Entered: 08/08/2023) ORDER GRANTING 50 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Joseph P. McCollum. Attorney added for Yeti Coolers, LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (bot2) (Entered: 08/08/2023)
04/25/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Omnivision Tech Inc 8:22-CV-01512 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON DEFENDANT OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'SMOTION TO STAY PENDING SOFTWARE SUPPLIER ACTION (DKT. 70) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Joint Stipulation to Reschedule Hearing on Defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc.s Motion to Stay Pending Software Supplier Action is MOOT. (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Omnivision Tech Inc 8:22-CV-01512 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (22-1512, DKT. 62; 22-1591, DKT. 62; 22-1979, DKT. 33) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, each motion is GRANTED and each case is stayed based on the customer suit exception pending the outcome of the Siemens action in the District of Delaware. The parties in each case shall file a joint status report on the earlier of every 90 days, or within 14 days of a the conclusion of that action or a very significant development in those proceedings that is material to whether the stay here should be lifted. Each report shall state the parties respective and/or collective positions regarding the stay in each action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (22-1512, DKT. 62; 22-1591, DKT. 62; 22-1979, DKT. 33) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, each motion is GRANTED and each case is stayed based on the customer suit exception pending the outcome of the Siemens action in the District of Delaware. The parties in each case shall file a joint status report on the earlier of every 90 days, or within 14 days of a the conclusion of that action or a very significant development in those proceedings that is material to whether the stay here should be lifted. Each report shall state the parties respective and/or collective positions regarding the stay in each action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Omnivision Tech Inc 8:22-CV-01591 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (22-1512, DKT. 62; 22-1591, DKT. 62; 22-1979, DKT. 33) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, each motion is GRANTED and each case is stayed based on the customer suit exception pending the outcome of the Siemens action in the District of Delaware. The parties in each case shall file a joint status report on the earlier of every 90 days, or within 14 days of a the conclusion of that action or a very significant development in those proceedings that is material to whether the stay here should be lifted. Each report shall state the parties respective and/or collective positions regarding the stay in each action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (22-1512, DKT. 62; 22-1591, DKT. 62; 22-1979, DKT. 33) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, each motion is GRANTED and each case is stayed based on the customer suit exception pending the outcome of the Siemens action in the District of Delaware. The parties in each case shall file a joint status report on the earlier of every 90 days, or within 14 days of a the conclusion of that action or a very significant development in those proceedings that is material to whether the stay here should be lifted. Each report shall state the parties respective and/or collective positions regarding the stay in each action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Omnivision Tech Inc 8:22-CV-01979 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (22-1512, DKT. 62; 22-1591, DKT. 62; 22-1979, DKT. 33) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, each motion is GRANTED and each case is stayed based on the customer suit exception pending the outcome of the Siemens action in the District of Delaware. The parties in each case shall file a joint status report on the earlier of every 90 days, or within 14 days of a the conclusion of that action or a very significant development in those proceedings that is material to whether the stay here should be lifted. Each report shall state the parties respective and/or collective positions regarding the stay in each action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (22-1512, DKT. 62; 22-1591, DKT. 62; 22-1979, DKT. 33) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, each motion is GRANTED and each case is stayed based on the customer suit exception pending the outcome of the Siemens action in the District of Delaware. The parties in each case shall file a joint status report on the earlier of every 90 days, or within 14 days of a the conclusion of that action or a very significant development in those proceedings that is material to whether the stay here should be lifted. Each report shall state the parties respective and/or collective positions regarding the stay in each action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
02/22/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Omnivision Tech Inc 8:22-CV-01840 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW COUNSEL by Judge George H. Wu. Having considered Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC'S Motion, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: Bell Semiconductor, LLC'S Motion is GRANTED.; granting 45 MOTION of Alan P. Block and Jack L. Meyer to Withdraw as Attorney. (aco) (Entered: 02/22/2023)
09/07/22	Cardshark LLC v. Louis Vuitton Malletier Sas 1:22-CV-05994 ( S.D. NY )	PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Plaintiff CardShark, LLC, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) (A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses their claims in this action, and this action itself, without prejudice. Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this case without prejudice under F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/7/2022) (rro) (Entered: 09/07/2022) PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Plaintiff CardShark, LLC, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) (A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses their claims in this action, and this action itself, without prejudice. Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this case without prejudice under F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/7/2022) (rro) (Entered: 09/07/2022)
09/07/22	Cardshark LLC v. Louis Vuitton Malletier Sas 1:22-CV-05994 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK -ADDITIONAL PLEADING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following additional trademark(s) have been included in a court action filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (tp) (Entered: 09/07/2022) AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK -ADDITIONAL PLEADING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following additional trademark(s) have been included in a court action filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (tp) (Entered: 09/07/2022)
	Id Image Sensing LLC v. Omnivision Tech Inc 1:20-CV-00136 ( D. DE )	Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,333,145 B2. (Attachments: # [1] Final Judgment)(nms)