Levy Craig
General
Cases8
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
Mech Eng, ManufSoftware, SecuritySemicond., Optic
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Defendant Provisur Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Doc. # [470] .) For the reasons stated in the order, the motion is DENIED. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Plaintiff Provisur Technologies, Inc.'s Daubert Motion to Limit Opinions of Weber Damages Expert David Leathers (Doc. # [433] ), Daubert Motion to Limit Opinions of Weber Damages Expert Lauren Kindler (Doc. # [435] ), and Daubert Motion to Limit Opinions of Weber Patent Expert Randall Rader (Doc. # [444] ). For the reasons stated in the order, Provisur's motions regarding Leathers and Kindler are DENIED. Provisur's motion regarding Rader is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Plaintiff Provisur Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Weber's Trade Secret and Unfair Competition Claims. (Doc. # [448] .) As set forth in the order, the motion is DENIED. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Plaintiff Provisur Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Validity of Provisur's 436 and 812 Patents. (Doc. # [453] .) As set forth in the order, the motion is GRANTED. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Weber, Inc., and Weber Food Technology GmbH's (Defendant or Weber) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. # [457] .) As set forth in the order, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Plaintiff Provisur Technologies, Inc.'s (Provisur or Plaintiff) Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Weber Patents. (Doc. # [458] .) As set forth in the order, the motion is DENIED. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 09/18/24 | Before the Court is Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Weber, Inc., and Weber Food Technology GmbH's (Weber) Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert James Farrell (Doc. # [436] ), Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Michael Jobin (Doc. # [437] ), Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Julie L. Davis (Doc. # [440] ), Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert John White (Doc. # [442] ), Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Keith Vorst (Doc. # [447] ), Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert David Roisum (Doc. # [450] ), and Daubert Motion to Limit or Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert David Kaplan (Doc. # [454] ). As set forth in the order, the motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed on 9/18/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Peters, Tracey) (Entered: 09/18/2024) | |
| 08/22/23 | MANDATE of US COURT OF APPEALS as to 550 Notice of Appeal filed by Provisur Technologies, Inc., 559 Notice of Appeal filed by Provisur Technologies, Inc. with mandate issued on 08/22/2023. (Terry, Jason) (Entered: 08/22/2023) | |
| 08/22/23 | USCA Judgment as to 550 Notice of Appeal filed by Provisur Technologies, Inc., 559 Notice of Appeal filed by Provisur Technologies, Inc. This is a preliminary judgment of U.S. Court of Appeals; jurisdiction is not recovered until the Mandate is issued by the U.S Court of Appeals. The parties submit a joint stipulation for voluntary dis-missal of Appeal No. 2023-1476 with each party to bear its own costs in connection with that appeal, which the court construes as a motion to voluntarily dismiss that appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.Upon consideration thereof,IT IS ORDERED THAT:(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2023-1476 is dismissed, and the revised official caption is reflected above.(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in connection with Appeal No. 2023-1476.(3) The reply brief remains due no later than September 1, 2023.(4) The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this order to the merits panel assigned to this case. (Terry, Jason) (Entered: 08/22/2023) | |
| 07/28/22 | ORDER granting 280 motion to consolidate cases Case No. 19-cv-06021-SRB and Case No. 20-cv-06069-SRB are hereby CONSOLIDATED, and all future filings should be made in Case No. 19-cv-06021-SRB. Signed on 7/28/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) (Entered: 07/28/2022) |