Corcoran IP Law PLLC

Texas

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.
Cases276
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Comp. Arch. and SoftwareCommunicationsSoftware, Security
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L5
A
PTAB
L5
A
CAFC
L5
A

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
09/10/24
AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to [56] Notice of Appeal, by AML IP, LLC (Ramey, William) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24
AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to [56] Notice of Appeal, by AML IP, LLC (Ramey, William) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24
AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 56 Notice of Appeal, by AML IP, LLC (Ramey, William) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24
Clerk's LR CV-10(d) Notice of Deficiency as to 56 Notice of Appeal and 58 Amended Notice of Appeal filed by AML IP, LLC. This is a Patent case and the Notice of Appeal should be filed using event Notice of Appeal - Federal Circuit. Please refile the document using the correct event. (rpc) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
11/16/23
NOTICE by Cellspin Soft, Inc. of Withdrawal of Counsel (Corcoran, Peter) (Filed on 11/16/2023) (Entered: 11/16/2023)
05/19/23
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ch, ) (Entered: 05/19/2023)
05/19/23
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff and Defendants in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/19/2023. (ch, ) (Entered: 05/19/2023)
08/26/22
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mcg) (Entered: 08/26/2022)
08/26/22
ORDER granting 14 Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all claims asserted by Communication Interface Technologies against Radisson in this action are dismissed with prejudice and that any counterclaims asserted by Radisson against Communication Interface Technologies in this action are dismissed with prejudice as moot pursuant to a settlement agreement, with each party bearing its own costs and fees. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 8/26/2022. (mcg) (Entered: 08/26/2022)
10/07/21
Final Civil Docket 08-26-2022