Hatch Law

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases88

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

CommunicationsComp. Arch. and SoftwareSoftware, Security

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/01/24	Avation Medical Inc v. Emkinetics Inc 4:24-CV-01702 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING PTAB REVIEW PROCEEDINGS OF CHALLENGED PATENTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar re [32] STIPULATION. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2025 at 02:00 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst ]Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 04/28/2025 at 2:00PM PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/]. (dms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2024) (Entered: 10/01/2024) ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING PTAB REVIEW PROCEEDINGS OF CHALLENGED PATENTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar re [32] STIPULATION. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2025 at 02:00 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst ]Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 04/28/2025 at 2:00PM PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/]. (dms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2024) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
09/26/24	Dish Technologies LLC v. MG Premium Ltd 2:23-CV-00552 ( D. UT )	Minute Order. Proceedings held before Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Motion Hearing held on 9/26/2024 re [58] MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support or to Transfer Case filed by MG Premium Ltd, MG Billing Ltd, [19] Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Sling TV LLC, DISH Technologies LLC. All parties appearing via Zoom conference. Court heard argument and took under advisement [58] Motion to Dismiss and [19] Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Attorney for Plaintiff: Brent Hatch, Hopkins Guy, Attorney for Defendant: S. Dewey, Ralph Dengler, Dennis McMahon. Court Reporter: Teena Green. (Time Start: 2:00, Time End: 4:20, Room: Zoom conference.) (mlp) (Entered: 09/26/2024) Minute Order. Proceedings held before Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Motion Hearing held on 9/26/2024 re [58] MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support or to Transfer Case filed by MG Premium Ltd, MG Billing Ltd, [19] Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Sling TV LLC, DISH Technologies LLC. All parties appearing via Zoom conference. Court heard argument and took under advisement [58] Motion to Dismiss and [19] Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Attorney for Plaintiff: Brent Hatch, Hopkins Guy, Attorney for Defendant: S. Dewey, Ralph Dengler, Dennis McMahon. Court Reporter: Teena Green. (Time Start: 2:00, Time End: 4:20, Room: Zoom conference.) (mlp) (Entered: 09/26/2024)
09/18/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting [454] Nearmap's Motion to Seal Document re [414] Sealed Document. Nearmap seeks to maintain under seal Exhibits 1-3 to its response [412] to EagleView's objection to the court's order denying EagleView's motion to compel production or inspection of accused camera systems [379] . Where these exhibits contain confidential, proprietary information regarding Nearmap's products, and the exhibits were filed in connection with a discovery dispute rather than dispositive motions, Nearmap's confidentiality interests outweigh the public interest in access at this stage. Therefore, these exhibits (Doc. Nos. 414-1, 414-2, and 414-3) shall remain sealed until otherwise ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/18/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 09/18/2024) DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting [454] Nearmap's Motion to Seal Document re [414] Sealed Document. Nearmap seeks to maintain under seal Exhibits 1-3 to its response [412] to EagleView's objection to the court's order denying EagleView's motion to compel production or inspection of accused camera systems [379] . Where these exhibits contain confidential, proprietary information regarding Nearmap's products, and the exhibits were filed in connection with a discovery dispute rather than dispositive motions, Nearmap's confidentiality interests outweigh the public interest in access at this stage. Therefore, these exhibits (Doc. Nos. 414-1, 414-2, and 414-3) shall remain sealed until otherwise ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/18/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 09/18/2024)
09/16/24	Facetec Inc v. Jumio Corp 3:24-CV-03623 ( N.D. CA )	MOTION to Intervene filed by iProov Ltd.. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 15, 18th Floor before Judge Rita F. Lin. Responses due by 9/30/2024. Replies due by 10/7/2024. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A, # [2] Proposed Order Granting iProov Ltd.'s Motion to Intervene)(Hatch, Ryan) (Filed on 9/16/2024) (Entered: 09/16/2024)
09/11/24	Facetec Inc v. Iproov Ltd 2:21-CV-02252 ( D. NV )	ORDER Granting [121] Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) to Extend Briefing Schedule re [117] Motion to Compel. Reply brief due by 9/20/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 9/11/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ) (Entered: 09/11/2024)
08/28/24	Dish Technologies LLC v. Aylo Freesites Ltd 2:24-CV-00066 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendants' 30 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. This case is stayed pending the conclusion of all the IPRs pending against Plaintiffs' asserted claims. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 8/28/2024. (eat) (Entered: 08/28/2024)
08/21/24	Wi Lan Inc v. TCT Mobile US Inc 8:24-CV-01403 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER REGARDING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE 31 by Judge James V. Selna, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No.: 8:24-cv-01403-JVS-ADS are STAYED pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiffs' receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2025, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case are VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) (Entered: 08/21/2024) ORDER REGARDING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE 31 by Judge James V. Selna, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No.: 8:24-cv-01403-JVS-ADS are STAYED pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiffs' receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2025, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case are VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) (Entered: 08/21/2024)
08/21/24	Wi Lan Inc v. TCT Mobile US Inc 8:24-CV-01403 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending settlement filed by Plaintiffs Wi-LAN Inc., Wi-LAN Labs, Inc., Wi-LAN USA, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Nelson, Edward) (Entered: 08/21/2024)
08/19/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER REGADING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Stay Case [283] : Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No. 8:23-cv-01476- GW-RAOx are stayed pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiff's receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2024, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case, including the Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, are vacated. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024) ORDER REGADING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Stay Case [283] : Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No. 8:23-cv-01476- GW-RAOx are stayed pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiff's receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2024, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case, including the Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, are vacated. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024)
08/19/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] held before Judge George H Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Court approves the stipulation to stay the case. Separate order to issue. A status conference is set for February 6, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a stipulation to dismiss, or a joint status report by noon on February 3, 2025. All previously set deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024) MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] held before Judge George H Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Court approves the stipulation to stay the case. Separate order to issue. A status conference is set for February 6, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a stipulation to dismiss, or a joint status report by noon on February 3, 2025. All previously set deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024)