Brown Wegner LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases26

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufCommunicationsTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
06/02/22	Goldfinch Design Studio LLC v. Collector's Universe Inc 3:20-CV-02542 ( D. NJ )	STIPULATION AND ORDER that the Clerk shall reopen this case. Upon entry of this Order this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 6/2/2022. (abr, ) (Entered: 06/02/2022)
12/07/21	Maxlite Inc v. Atg Electronics Ltd 5:20-CV-02648 ( C.D. CA )	CONSENT JUDGMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John W. Holcomb. WHEREAS the Parties agree that this Consent Injunction shall not be deemed to be an interpretation or construction of any claim or term of the Asserted Patentsand further agree that this Consent Injunction is an agreement between the Parties as a matter of compromise in lieu of litigating patent issues; (See document for further details) Related to: Stipulation for Settlement 52 ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (yl) (Entered: 12/07/2021) CONSENT JUDGMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John W. Holcomb. WHEREAS the Parties agree that this Consent Injunction shall not be deemed to be an interpretation or construction of any claim or term of the Asserted Patentsand further agree that this Consent Injunction is an agreement between the Parties as a matter of compromise in lieu of litigating patent issues; (See document for further details) Related to: Stipulation for Settlement 52 ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (yl) (Entered: 12/07/2021)
12/07/21	Maxlite Inc v. Atg Electronics Ltd 5:20-CV-02648 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: The further Status Conference currently set for December 10, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED. This case is closed, including with respect to claims against Defendants who were named and previously dismissed, with each Party bearing its own attorneys` fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 12/07/2021) ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: The further Status Conference currently set for December 10, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED. This case is closed, including with respect to claims against Defendants who were named and previously dismissed, with each Party bearing its own attorneys` fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 12/07/2021)
12/07/21	Maxlite Inc v. Atg Electronics Ltd 5:20-CV-02648 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 12-07-2021
05/17/21	Caravan Canopy Intl Inc v. Home Depot USA Inc 8:19-CV-01072 ( C.D. CA )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US5944040 in IPR2021-00449
08/13/19	Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC 2:19-CV-06952 ( C.D. CA )	21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Lowes Home Centers, LLC. (jtil) (Entered: 08/13/2019)
08/12/19	Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC 2:19-CV-06952 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) (Entered: 08/12/2019)
08/12/19	Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC 2:19-CV-06952 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jtil) (Entered: 08/12/2019)
02/25/21	Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC 2:19-CV-06952 ( C.D. CA )	CORRECTED MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): The Court GRANTS the motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Moving Defendants motion to stay pending the Patent Offices decision on the IPR petition. This order administratively closes the following cases: (1) No. SACV 19-1072 PSG (ADSx); (2) No. EDCV 19-1224 PSG (ADSx); (3) No. CV 19-6224 PSG (ADSx); and (4) No. CV 19-6952 PSG (ADSx). Any of the parties may apply ex parte to reopen their case after the conclusion of all IPR proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 02/25/2021) CORRECTED MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): The Court GRANTS the motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Moving Defendants motion to stay pending the Patent Offices decision on the IPR petition. This order administratively closes the following cases: (1) No. SACV 19-1072 PSG (ADSx); (2) No. EDCV 19-1224 PSG (ADSx); (3) No. CV 19-6224 PSG (ADSx); and (4) No. CV 19-6952 PSG (ADSx). Any of the parties may apply ex parte to reopen their case after the conclusion of all IPR proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 02/25/2021)
02/25/21	Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC 2:19-CV-06952 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS the motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Moving Defendants motion to stay pending the Patent Offices decision on the IPR petition. This order administratively closes the following cases: (1) No. SACV 19-1072 PSG (ADSx); (2) No. EDCV 19-1124 PSG (ADSx); (3) No. CV 19-6224 PSG (ADSx); and (4) No. CV 19-6952 PSG (ADSx). Any of the parties may apply ex parte to reopen their case after the conclusion of all IPR proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 02/25/2021) MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS the motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Moving Defendants motion to stay pending the Patent Offices decision on the IPR petition. This order administratively closes the following cases: (1) No. SACV 19-1072 PSG (ADSx); (2) No. EDCV 19-1124 PSG (ADSx); (3) No. CV 19-6224 PSG (ADSx); and (4) No. CV 19-6952 PSG (ADSx). Any of the parties may apply ex parte to reopen their case after the conclusion of all IPR proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 02/25/2021)