Nossaman LLP
General
Cases31
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
Comp. Arch. and SoftwareSoftware, SecuritySemicond., Optic
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 11/15/23 | The following patents were Instituted by PTAB:
Patent US10699008 in IPR2023-00821 | |
| 07/21/23 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 112 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment ) filed by Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Ryan Nishimoto ISO Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.'s Opposition to Finelite Inc.'s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement)(Sharifahmadian, Ali) (Filed on 7/21/2023) (Entered: 07/21/2023) | |
| 10/19/22 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sucxess LLC as to Sole Defendant (Pazuniak, George) (Entered: 10/19/2022) | |
| 10/19/22 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s). (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(mdb) (Entered: 10/19/2022) | |
| 10/19/22 | CASE CLOSED (dlw) (Entered: 10/19/2022) | |
| 03/15/21 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE) (Dkt. 57 ); JS-6 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of the parties Joint Report re Settlement, the Court orders that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 30 days from the date of this Order; provided, however, any request by any party(ies) that the Court do so, shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 30-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party(ies) making such a request reasonably expect the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41, which does not require the approval of the Court. Such a stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 30-day period, or by such later date ordered by the Court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 03/15/2021) | |
| 03/11/21 | STATUS REPORT JOINT REPORT RE SETTLEMENT filed by Counter Defendants Brandable Ventures, LLC, Ryan Shapiro, Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC. (Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 03/11/2021) | |
| 02/16/21 | REPORT filed by Counter Defendant Brandable Ventures, LLC, Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC. (Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 02/16/2021) | |
| 02/05/21 | SUPPLEMENT to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue 22 filed by Defendants Always More Marketing, Inc., Jonathan Greenburg, Laura Greenburg, Zyppah, Inc., Counter Claimants Always More Marketing, Inc., Jonathan Greenburg, Laura Greenburg, Zyppah, Inc.. (Katz, Michael) (Entered: 02/05/2021) | |
| 01/04/21 | JOINT REPORT of regarding Setting Dates as to Patent-Related MattersPatent filed by Counter Defendants Brandable Ventures, LLC, Ryan Shapiro, Plaintiff Brandable Ventures, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Scott, Ilse) (Entered: 01/04/2021) |